Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Resolution recovery in pinhole SPECT based on multi-ray projections: a phantom study

  • Original article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Low sensitivity can become a major problem when very small pinholes are used in SPECT imaging. Although a larger pinhole aperture will improve the sensitivity, this will be at the cost of the spatial resolution. With a view to improving the resolution–sensitivity trade-off, this paper explores an iterative reconstruction algorithm that models the pinhole aperture based on multi-ray projections.

Methods

This new implementation was validated using simulated data and phantom experiments. Two approaches were investigated. Firstly, the pinhole aperture was modelled in both the forward and the back projector. Secondly, the dual matrix implementation was investigated by modelling the pinhole aperture only in the forward projector. The systematic error, the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and the statistical error were quantified using the simulated data. Experimental phantom data were acquired for visual comparison with the reconstructions obtained from the simulated data.

Results

For a predefined number of iterations, the systematic error, the FWHM and the statistical error could be decreased when the pinhole aperture was modelled during iterative reconstruction. For a fixed, predefined statistical error of ±10%, smaller systematic errors and smaller FWHM were obtained when modelling the pinhole opening. When the dual matrix implementation was used, equivalent results could be obtained as when modelling the pinhole opening in both the forward and the back projector.

Conclusion

The multi-ray method to accomplish resolution recovery during the reconstruction of pinhole SPECT projection images offers a better trade-off between spatial resolution and noise compared with a reconstruction which does not model the pinhole aperture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weber DA, Ivanovic M, Franceschi D, Strand SE, Erlandsson K, Franceschi M, et al. Pinhole SPECT: an approach to in vivo high resolution SPECT imaging in small laboratory animals. J Nucl Med 1994;35(2):342–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaszczak RJ, Li J, Wang H, Zalutsky MR, Coleman RE. Pinhole collimation for ultra-high-resolution, small-field-of-view SPECT. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:425–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishizu K, Mukai T, Yonekura Y, Pagani M, Fujita T, Magata Y, et al. Ultra-high resolution SPECT system using four pinhole collimators for small animal studies. J Nucl Med 1995;36(12):2282–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber DA, Ivanovic M Pinhole SPECT: ultra-high resolution imaging for small animal studies. J Nucl Med 1995;36(12):2287–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yukihiro M, Inoue T, Iwasaki T, Tomiyoshi K, Erlandsson K, Endo K. Myocardial infarction in rats: high-resolution single-photon emission tomographic imaging with a pinhole collimator. Eur J Nucl Med 1996;23(8):896–900.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weber DA, Ivanovic M. Ultra-high-resolution imaging of small animals: implications for preclinical and research studies. J Nucl Cardiol 1999;6(3):332–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Habraken JB, de Bruin K, Shehata M, Booij J, Bennink R, van Eck Smit BL, et al. Evaluation of high-resolution pinhole SPECT using a small rotating animal. J Nucl Med 2001;42(12):1863–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeniya T, Watabe H, Aoi T, Kim KM, Teramoto N, Hayashi T, et al. A new reconstruction strategy for image improvement in pinhole SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(8):1166–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meikle SR, Kench P, Kassiou M, Banati RB. Small animal SPECT and its place in the matrix of molecular imaging technologies. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:R45–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meikle SR, Kench P, Weisenberger AG, Wojcik R, Smith MF, Majewski S, et al. A prototype coded aperture detector for small animal SPECT. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2002;49:2167–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schramm NU, Ebel G, Engeland U, Schurrat T, Behe M, Behr TM. High-resolution SPECT using multi-pinhole collimation. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50:315–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beekman FJ, Vastenhouw B. Design and simulation of a high-resolution stationary SPECT system for small animals. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:4579–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beekman FJ, van der Have F, Vastenhouw B, van der Linden AJ, van Rijk PP, Burbach JP, et al. U-SPECT-I: a novel system for submillimeter-resolution tomography with radiolabeled molecules in mice. J Nucl Med 2005;46(7):1194–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeng GL, Hsieh YL, Gullberg GT. A rotating and warping projector-backprojector pair for fan-beam and cone-beam iterative algorithms. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1994;41:2807–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bai C, Zeng GL, Gullberg GT, DiFillippo F, Miller S. Slab-by-slab blurring model for geometric point response correction and attenuation correction using iterative reconstruction algorithms. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1998;45:2168–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown JK, Kalki K, Heanue J, Hasegawa BH. Quantitative SPECT reconstruction using multi-ray projection integrators. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record 1995;2:1272–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng GL, Gullberg GT, Tsui BMW. Three dimensional iterative reconstruction algorithms with attenuation and geometric point response correction. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1991;38:693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamphuis C, Beekman FJ, van Rijk PP, Viergever MA. Dual matrix ordered subsets reconstruction for accelerated 3D scatter compensation in single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25(1):8–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beque D, Nuyts J, Bormans G, Suetens P, Dupont P. Characterization of pinhole SPECT acquisition geometry. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22(5):599–612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beque D, Nuyts J, Suetens P, Bormans G. Optimization of geometrical calibration in pinhole SPECT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24(2):180–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vanhove C, Defrise M, Franken PR, Everaert H, Deconinck F, Bossuyt A. Interest of the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OS-EM) algorithm in pinhole single-photon emission tomography reconstruction: a phantom study. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27(2):140–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Abramowitz M, Stegun I. Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover 1972.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Nils Schramm of Research Center Jülich (Germany) for providing the two physical phantoms. This work was supported by F.W.O. grant G.0174.03.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (AZ VUB), 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium

    Christian Vanhove, Andriy Andreyev, Michel Defrise & Axel Bossuyt

  2. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL), Leuven, Belgium

    Johan Nuyts

Authors
  1. Christian Vanhove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andriy Andreyev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michel Defrise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johan Nuyts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Axel Bossuyt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Vanhove.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanhove, C., Andreyev, A., Defrise, M. et al. Resolution recovery in pinhole SPECT based on multi-ray projections: a phantom study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34, 170–180 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0225-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0225-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation