Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate and [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide: which peptide is preferable for PRRT?

  • Original article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with somatostatin receptor subtype 2-positive metastasised neuroendocrine tumours can be treated with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate. Some use octreotide as the peptide for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). We compared in seven patients [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide (177Lu-DOTATOC) and [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate (177Lu-DOTATATE), to see which peptide should be preferred for PRRT with 177Lu.

Methods

In the same patients, 3,700 MBq 177Lu-DOTATOC and 3,700 MBq 177Lu-DOTATATE was administered in separate therapy sessions. Amino acids were co-administered. Whole-body scanning was performed on days 1, 4 and 7 post therapy. Blood and urine samples were collected. We calculated residence times for tumours, spleen and kidneys.

Results

All patients had longer residence times in spleen, kidneys and tumours after use of 177Lu-DOTATATE (p=0.016 in each case). Comparing 177Lu-DOTATATE with 177Lu-DOTATOC, the mean residence time ratio was 2.1 for tumour, 1.5 for spleen and 1.4 for kidneys. Dose-limiting factors for PRRT are bone marrow and/or kidney dose. Although the residence time for kidneys was longer when using 177Lu-DOTATATE, the mean administered dose to tumours would still be advantageous by a factor of 1.5, assuming a fixed maximum kidney dose is reached. Plasma radioactivity after 177Lu-DOTATATE was comparable to that after 177Lu-DOTATOC. Urinary excretion of radioactivity was comparable during the first 6 h; thereafter there was a significant advantage for 177Lu-DOTATOC.

Conclusion

177Lu-DOTATATE had a longer tumour residence time than 177Lu-DOTATOC. Despite a longer residence time in kidneys after 177Lu-DOTATATE, tumour dose will always be higher. Therefore, we conclude that the better peptide for PRRT is octreotate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kwekkeboom DJ, Teunissen JJ, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, de Herder WW, Feelders RA, et al Radiolabeled somatostatin analog [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate in patients with endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2754–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Teunissen JJ, Kwekkeboom DJ, Krenning EP. Quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic tumors treated with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2724–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodei L, Cremonesi M, Zoboli S, Grana C, Bartolomei M, Rocca P, et al Receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy with 90Y-DOTATOC in association with amino acid infusion: a phase I study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:207–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwekkeboom DJ, Mueller-Brand J, Paganelli G, Anthony LB, Pauwels S, Kvols LK, et al Overview of results of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 3 radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. J Nucl Med 2005;46 Suppl 1:62–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reubi JC, Schar JC, Waser B, Wenger S, Heppeler A, Schmitt JS, et al Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1–SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27:273–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Jong M, Breeman WA, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, Bernard BF, Hofland LJ, et al Comparison of 111In-labeled somatostatin analogues for tumor scintigraphy and radionuclide therapy. Cancer Res 1998;58:437–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Jong M, Breeman WA, Bernard BF, Bakker WH, Schaar M, van Gameren A, et al [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3] octreotate for somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy. Int J Cancer 2001;92:628–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Capello A, Krenning EP, Breeman WA, Bernard BF, Konijnenberg MW, de Jong M. Tyr3-octreotide and Tyr3-octreotate radiolabeled with 177Lu or 90Y: peptide receptor radionuclide therapy results in vitro. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2003;18:761–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsson O, Kolby L, Bernhardt P, Forssell-Aronsson E, Johanson V, Ahlman H. GOT1 xenografted to nude mice: a unique model for in vivo studies on SSTR-mediated radiation therapy of carcinoid tumors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004;1014:275–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmitt A, Bernhardt P, Nilsson O, Ahlman H, Kolby L, Forssell-Aronsson E. Differences in biodistribution between 99mTc-depreotide, 111In-DTPA-octreotide, and 177Lu-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate in a small cell lung cancer animal model. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2005;20:231–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, Konijnenberg MW, Srinivasan A, Erion JL, et al [177Lu-DOTA0Tyr3]octreotate: comparison with [111In-DTPA0]octreotide in patients. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:1319–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Forrer F, Uusijarvi H, Waldherr C, Cremonesi M, Bernhardt P, Mueller-Brand J, et al A comparison of 111In-DOTATOC and 111In-DOTATATE: biodistribution and dosimetry in the same patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:1257–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dominguez S, Denys A, Menu Y, Ruszniewski P. Hepatic arterial chemoembolization in the management of advanced digestive endocrine tumours. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999;31 Suppl 2:213–5

    Google Scholar 

  14. Venook AP. Embolization and chemoembolization therapy for neuroendocrine tumors. Curr Opin Oncol 1999;11:38–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Toole D, Hentic O, Corcos O, Ruszniewski P. Chemotherapy for gastro-enteropancreatic endocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology 2004;80 Suppl 1:79–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oberg K. Chemotherapy and biotherapy in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. Ann Oncol 2001;12 Suppl 2:111–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all supporting personnel of the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, for their help and effort. Also, gratitude is expressed to Prof. H.R. Maecke, University Hospital Basel, for the supply of [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Esser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esser, J.P., Krenning, E.P., Teunissen, J.J.M. et al. Comparison of [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate and [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide: which peptide is preferable for PRRT?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33, 1346–1351 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0172-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0172-9

Keywords

Navigation