Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy of transmission CT and FDG-PET in the detection of small pulmonary nodules with integrated PET/CT

  • Original article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of detection of small pulmonary nodules on quiet breathing attenuation correction CT (CTAC) and FDG-PET when performing integrated PET/CT, as compared with a diagnostic inspiratory CT scan acquired in the same imaging session.

Methods

PET/CT scans of 107 patients with a history of carcinoma (54 male and 53 female, mean age 57.3 years) were analyzed. All patients received an integrated PET/CT scan including a CTAC acquired during quiet respiration and a contrast-enhanced CT acquired during inspiration in the same session. Breathing CTAC scans were reviewed by two thoracic radiologists for the presence of pulmonary nodules. FDG-PET scans were reviewed to determine accuracy of nodule detection. Diagnostic CT was used as the gold standard to confirm or refute the presence of nodules.

Results

On the CTAC scans 200 nodules were detected, of which 183 were true positive (TP) and 17, false positive. There were 109 false negatives (FN). Overall, 51 (48%) patients had a false interpretation, including 19 in whom CT was interpreted as normal for lung nodules. The average size of the nodules missed was 3.8±2 mm (range 2–12 mm). None of the nodules missed on the CTAC scans were detected by PET. In the right lung there were 20 TP, 42 true negative (TN), 11 FP, and 34 FN interpretations with a sensitivity in nodule detection of 37% (CI 24–51%) and a specificity of 79% (CI 66–89%). In the left lungs there were 16 TP, 65 TN, 3 FP, and 23 FN interpretations, with a sensitivity of 41% (CI 26–58%) and a specificity of 96% (CI 88–99%).

Conclusion

The detection of small pulmonary nodules by breathing CTAC and FDG-PET is relatively poor. Therefore an additional diagnostic thoracic CT scan obtained during suspended inspiration is recommended for thorough evaluation of those patients in whom detection of pulmonary metastases is necessary for management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dewan NA, Gupta NC, Redepenning LS, Phalen JJ, Frick MP. Diagnostic efficacy of PET-FDG imaging in solitary pulmonary nodules. Potential role in evaluation and management. Chest 1993;104:997–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer BM, Mortensen J, Dirksen A, Eigtved A, Hojgaard L. Positron emission tomography of incidentally detected small pulmonary nodules. Nucl Med Commun 2004;25:3–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta NC, Frank AR, Dewan NA, Redepenning LS, Rothberg ML, Mailliard JA, et al Solitary pulmonary nodules: detection of malignancy with PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology 1992;184:441–444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta NC, Maloof J, Gunel E. Probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules using fluorine-18-FDG and PET. J Nucl Med 1996;37:943–948

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Patz EF Jr, Lowe VJ, Hoffman JM, Paine SS, Burrowes P, Coleman RE, et al. Focal pulmonary abnormalities: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Radiology 1993;188:487–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benjamin MS, Drucker EA, McLoud TC, Shepard JA. Small pulmonary nodules: detection at chest CT and outcome. Radiology 2003;226:489–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beyer T, Antoch G, Muller S, Egelhof T, Freudenberg LS, Debatin J, et al. Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT Imaging. J Nucl Med 2004;45:25S–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Juan R, Seifert B, Berthold T, von Schulthess GK, Goerres GW. Clinical evaluation of a breathing protocol for PET/CT. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1118–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goerres GW, Burger C, Kamel E, Seifert B, Kaim AH, Buck A, et al Respiration-induced attenuation artifact at PET/CT: technical considerations. Radiology 2003;226:906–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goerres GW, Kamel E, Seifert B, Burger C, Buck A, Hany TF, et al Accuracy of image coregistration of pulmonary lesions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using an integrated PET/CT system. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1469–1475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coleman RE, Delbeke D, Guiberteau MJ, Conti PS, Royal HD, Weinreb JC, et al Concurrent PET/CT with an integrated imaging system: intersociety dialogue from the joint working group of the American College of Radiology, the Society of Nuclear Medicine, and the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1225–1239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, Midthun DE, Sloan JA, Sykes AM, et al Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003;226:756–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diederich S, Thomas M, Semik M, Lenzen H, Roos N, Weber A, et al Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers. Eur Radiol 2004;14:691–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Libby DM, Smith JP, Altorki NK, Pasmantier MW, Yankelevitz D, Henschke CI. Managing the small pulmonary nodule discovered by CT. Chest 2004;125:1522–1529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henschke CI, Shaham D, Farooqi A, Yankelevitz DF. Computerized tomography screening for lung cancer: new findings and diagnostic work-up. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;15:397–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R. Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2378–2383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Egelhof T, Stattaus J, Jentzen W, Debatin JF, et al Focal tracer uptake: a potential artifact in contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT scans. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1339–1342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beyer T, Antoch G, Bockisch A, Stattaus J. Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2005;46:429–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T, Freudenberg LF, Akhurst T, Mueller S. Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:588–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohade C, Osman M, Marshall LN, Wahl RN. PET-CT: accuracy of PET and CT spatial registration of lung lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:721–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Marshall LT, Leal JP, Wahl RL. Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients. J Nucl Med 2003;44:240–243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim JS, Kim JH, Cho G, Bae KT. Automated detection of pulmonary nodules on CT images: effect of section thickness and reconstruction interval—initial results. Radiology 2005;236:295–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carretta A, Ciriaco P, Canneto B, Nicoletti R, Del Maschio A, Zannini P. Therapeutic strategy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer associated to satellite pulmonary nodules. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:1100–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Picci P, Vanel D, Briccoli A, Talle K, Haakenaasen U, Malaguti C, et al Computed tomography of pulmonary metastases from osteosarcoma: the less poor technique. A study of 51 patients with histological correlation. Ann Oncol 2001;12:1601–1604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Headrick JR, Miller DL, Nagorney DM, Allen MS, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, et al Surgical treatment of hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colon cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:975–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfannschmidt J, Muley T, Hoffmann H, Dienemann H. Prognostic factors and survival after complete resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma: experiences in 167 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:732–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bacci G, Mercuri M, Briccoli A, Ferrari S, Bertoni F, Donati D, et al Osteogenic sarcoma of the extremity with detectable lung metastases at presentation. Results of treatment of 23 patients with chemotherapy followed by simultaneous resection of primary and metastatic lesions. Cancer 1997;79:245–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leung AN. Spiral CT of the thorax in daily practice: optimization of technique. J Thorac Imaging 1997;12:2–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW. Spiral (helical) CT. Radiology 1993;189:647–656

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was approved by our institution’s human subjects research committee and the methods complied with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of the United Stages of America.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne L. Aquino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aquino, S.L., Kuester, L.B., Muse, V.V. et al. Accuracy of transmission CT and FDG-PET in the detection of small pulmonary nodules with integrated PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33, 692–696 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-0018-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-0018-x

Keywords

Navigation