Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diagnostic work-up in patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) is often challenging and frequently includes nuclear medicine procedures. Whereas a role for leucocyte or granulocyte scintigraphy in FUO is generally accepted, a possible role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in these patients remains to be established. To study this, we compared prospectively, on a head-to-head basis, the diagnostic value of FDG-PET and indium-111 granulocyte scintigraphy in patients with FUO. Nineteen patients with FUO underwent both FDG-PET and 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy within 1 week. FDG-PET scans and granulocyte scintigrams were reviewed by different doctors who were blinded to the result of the other investigation. The diagnostic values of FDG-PET and granulocyte scintigraphy were evaluated with regard to identification of a focal infectious/inflammatory or malignant cause of FUO. The sensitivity of granulocyte scintigraphy and FDG-PET were 71% [95% confidence interval (CI): 37–85%] and 50% (CI: 16–84%), respectively. The specificity of granulocyte scintigraphy was 92% (71–100%), which was significantly higher than that of FDG-PET, at 46% (34–62%). Positive and negative predictive values for granulocyte scintigraphy were both 85%. Positive and negative predictive values for FDG-PET were 30% and 67%, respectively. 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy has a superior diagnostic performance compared to FDG-PET for detection of a localised infectious/inflammatory or neoplastic cause of FUO. The poorer performance of FDG-PET is in particular attributable to a high percentage of false positive scans, leading to low specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnow PM, Flaherty JP. Fever of unknown origin. Lancet 1997; 350:575–580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mourad O, Palda V, Detsky AS. A comprehensive evidence-based approach to fever of unknown origin. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:545–551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mourad O, Palda V, Detsky AS. Review: fair evidence supports several tests in investigating fever of unknown origin. Evidence Based Medicine 2003; 8:156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker W, Meller J. The role of nuclear medicine in infection and inflammation. Lancet Infect Dis 2001; 1:326–333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Corstens FH, van der Meer JW. Nuclear medicine’s role in infection and inflammation. Lancet 1999; 354:765–770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters AM. Nuclear medicine imaging in fever of unknown origin. Q J Nucl Med 1999; 43:61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kjaer A, Lebech AM. Diagnostic value of111In-granulocyte scintigraphy in patients with fever of unknown origin. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:140–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blockmans D, Knockaert D, Maes A, et al. Clinical value of [18F]fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for patients with fever of unknown origin. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32:191–196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meller J, Altenvoerde G, Munzel U, et al. Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of [18F]FDG imaging with a double-head coincidence camera and gallium-67 citrate SPET. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27:1617–1625.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lorenzen J, Buchert R, Bohuslavizki KH. Value of FDG PET in patients with fever of unknown origin. Nucl Med Commun 2001; 22:779–783.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DeGrado TR, Turkington TG, Williams JJ, Stearns CW, Hoffman JM, Coleman RE. Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. J Nucl Med 1994; 35:1398–1406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley, 1981.

  13. de Kleijn EM, van der Meer JW. Fever of unknown origin (FUO): report on 53 patients in a Dutch university hospital. Neth J Med 1995; 47:54–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Kleijn EM, Vandenbroucke JP, van der Meer JW. Fever of unknown origin (FUO). I. A prospective multicenter study of 167 patients with FUO, using fixed epidemiologic entry criteria. The Netherlands FUO Study Group. Medicine (Baltimore) 1997; 76:392–400.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knockaert DC, Vanneste LJ, Vanneste SB, Bobbaers HJ. Fever of unknown origin in the 1980s. An update of the diagnostic spectrum. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152:51–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davies SG, Garvie NW. The role of indium-labelled leukocyte imaging in pyrexia of unknown origin. Br J Radiol 1990; 63:850–854.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt KG, Rasmussen JW, Sorensen PG, Wedebye IM. Indium-111-granulocyte scintigraphy in the evaluation of patients with fever of undetermined origin. Scand J Infect Dis 1987; 19:339–345.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Syrjala MT, Valtonen V, Liewendahl K, Myllyla G. Diagnostic significance of indium-111 granulocyte scintigraphy in febrile patients. J Nucl Med 1987; 28:155–160.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Donation of PET facilities by the John and Birthe Meyer Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Kjaer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kjaer, A., Lebech, AM., Eigtved, A. et al. Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31, 622–626 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1425-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1425-5

Keywords

Navigation