Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Positron flight in human tissues and its influence on PET image spatial resolution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of the positron distance of flight in various human tissues on the spatial resolution in positron emission tomography (PET) was assessed for positrons from carbon-11, nitrogen-13, oxygen-15, fluorine-18, gallium-68 and rubidium-82. The investigation was performed using the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE to simulate the transport of positrons within human compact bone, adipose, soft and lung tissue. The simulations yielded 3D distributions of annihilation origins that were projected on the image plane in order to assess their impact on PET spatial resolution. The distributions obtained were cusp-shaped with long tails rather than Gaussian shaped, thus making conventional full width at half maximum (FWHM) measures uncertain. The full width at 20% of the maximum amplitude (FW20M) of the annihilation distributions yielded more appropriate values for root mean square addition of spatial resolution loss components. Large differences in spatial resolution losses due to the positron flight in various human tissues were found for the selected radionuclides. The contribution to image blur was found to be up to three times larger in lung tissue than in soft tissue or fat and five times larger than in bone tissue. For 18F, the spatial resolution losses were 0.54 mm in soft tissue and 1.52 mm in lung tissue, compared with 4.10 and 10.5 mm, respectively, for 82Rb. With lung tissue as a possible exception, the image blur due to the positron flight in all human tissues has a minor impact as long as PET cameras with a spatial resolution of 5–7 mm are used in combination with 18F-labelled radiopharmaceuticals. However, when ultra-high spatial resolution PET cameras, with 3–4 mm spatial resolution, are applied, especially in combination with other radionuclides, the positron flight may enter as a limiting factor for the total PET spatial resolution—particularly in lung tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chatziioannou AF, Cherry SR, Shao Y, Silverman RW, Meadors K, Farquhar TH, Pedarsani M, Pheps ME. Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging. J Nucl Med 1999; 40:1164–1175.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melcher Cl. Scintillation crystals for PET. J Nucl Med 2000; 41:1051–1055.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brix G, Zaers J, Adam LE, Bellemann ME, Ostertag H, Trojan H, Haberkorn U, Doll J, Oberdoifer F, Lorenz WJ. Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. J Nucl Med 1997; 38:1614–1623.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adam LE, Karp JS, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Smith RJ. Performance of a whole-body PET scanner using curve-plate NaI(Tl) detectors. J Nucl Med 2001; 42:1821–1830.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moses WW, Virador PRG, Derenzo SE, Huesman RH, Budinger TF. Design of a High-resolution, high-sensitivity PET camera for human brains and small animals. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1997; NS-44:1487–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Budinger TH. PET instrumentation: what are the limits? Semin Nucl Med 1998; 3:247–267.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Derenzo SE. Precision measurement of annihilation point distributions for medically important positron emitters. In: Positron annihilation. Sendai, Japan: The Japan Institute of Metals; 1979:819–823.

  8. Cho ZH, Chan JK, Eriksson L, Singh M, Graham S, MacDonald NS, Yano Y. Positron ranges obtained from biomedical important positron-emitting radionuclides. J Nucl Med 1975; 16:1174–1176.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer MR, Brownell GL Annihilation density distribution calculations for medically important positron emitters. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1993; 11:373–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Levin CS, Hoffman EJ. Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44:781–799.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baró J, Sempau J, Férnandez-Varea JM, Salvat F. PENELOPE: an algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter. Nucl Instrum Meth 1995; B100:31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sampau J, Acosta E, Baró J, Fernández-Varea JM, Salvat F. An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of coupled electron-photon transport. Nucl Instrum Meth 1997; B132:377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salvat F, Fernández-Varea JM, Acosta E, Sempau J. PENELOPE, a code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. OECD/NEA 5–7 November 2001, NEA/NSC/DOC(2001)19. ISBN: 92–64–18475–9

  14. ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Photon, electron, proton and neutron interaction data for body tissues. 1992: Report 46.

  15. ICRP. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Reference man: anatomical, physiological and metabolic characteristics. ICRP Publication 23. New York: Pergamon Press, 1975.

  16. Cross WG, Ing H, Freedman N. A short atlas of beta-ray spectra. Phys Med Biol 1983; 28:1251–1260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bielajew AF, Hirayama H, Nelson WR, Rogers DWO. History, overview and recent improvements of EGS4. Report NRCC/PIRS-0436, June 1994.

  18. Haber SF, Derenzo SE, Uber D. Application of mathematical removal of positron range blurring in positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1990; NS37:1293–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Stephen M. Seltzer from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA, for providing calculated beta energy spectra. This work was funded by the Karolinska Hospital FoUU of the Stockholm Country Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Hospital Physics, Karolinska Hospital, 176 76, Stockholm, Sweden

    Alejandro Sánchez-Crespo & Stig A. Larsson

  2. Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Stockholm University and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Alejandro Sánchez-Crespo, Pedro Andreo & Stig A. Larsson

Authors
  1. Alejandro Sánchez-Crespo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro Andreo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stig A. Larsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Sánchez-Crespo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sánchez-Crespo, A., Andreo, P. & Larsson, S.A. Positron flight in human tissues and its influence on PET image spatial resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31, 44–51 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1330-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1330-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation