Skip to main content
Log in

Therapeutic impact of [18F]fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography on patients with unclear foot pain

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the therapeutic impact of [18F]fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]fluoride PET/CT) imaging on patients with unclear foot pain.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients were prospectively included in this study. Therapeutic management was defined by two experienced dedicated foot surgeons before and after [18F]fluoride PET/CT imaging. Twenty-six patients underwent cross-sectional imaging [CT, magnetic resonance (MR)] prior to PET/CT. A retrospective analysis of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnoses was performed when a therapy change occurred after PET/CT imaging.

Results

In 13/28 (46%) patients therapeutic management was changed due to PET/CT results. Management changes occurred in patients with the following diagnoses: os trigonum syndrome; sinus tarsi syndrome; os tibiale externum syndrome; osteoarthritis of several joints; non-consolidated fragments; calcaneo-navicular coalition; plantar fasciitis; insertional tendinopathy; suggestion of periostitis; neoarticulations between metatarsal bones. Os trigonum, os tibiale externum, subtalar osteoarthritis and plantar fasciitis were only seen to be active on PET/CT images but not on MR images.

Conclusion

[18F]fluoride PET/CT has a substantial therapeutic impact on management in patients with unclear foot pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grant FD, Fahey FH, Packard AB, Davis RT, Alavi A, Treves ST. Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Groves AM, Win T, Haim SB, Ell PJ. Non-(18F)FDG PET in clinical oncology (review). Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:822–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Even-Sapir E, Mishani E, Flusser G, Metser U. 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37:462–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schirrmeister H, Guhlmann A, Kotzerke J, Santjohanser C, Kühn T, Kreienberg R, et al. Early detection and accurate description of extent of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer with fluoride ion and positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2381–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schirrmeister H, Glatting G, Hetzel J, Nüssle K, Arslandemir C, Buck AK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the clinical value of planar bone scans, SPECT, and 18F-labeled NaF PET in newly diagnosed lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1800–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Mishani E, Lievshitz G, Lerman H, Leibovitch I. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:287–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beheshti M, Vali R, Waldenberger P, Fitz F, Nader M, Loidl W, et al. Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1766–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schirrmeister H, Guhlmann A, Elsner K, Kotzerke J, Glatting G, Rentschler M, et al. Sensitivity in detecting osseous lesions depends on anatomic localization: planar bone scintigraphy versus 18F PET. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1623–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brenner W, Vernon C, Conrad EU, Eary JF. Assessment of the metabolic activity of bone grafts with 18F-fluoride PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1291–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frost ML, Blake GM, Park-Holohan S-J, Cook GJR, Curran KM, Marsden PK, et al. Long-term precision of 18F-fluoride PET skeletal kinetic studies in the assessment of bone metabolism. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:700–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sterner T, Pink R, Freudenberg L, Jentzen T, Quitmann H, Bockisch A, et al. The role of [18F]fluoride positron emission tomography in the early detection of aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg. 2007;5:99–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ovadia D, Metser U, Lievshitz G, Yaniv M, Wientroub S, Even-Sapir E. Back pain in adolescents: assessment with integrated 18F-fluoride positron-emission tomography-computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27:90–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sörensen J, Michaelsson K, Strand H, Sundelin S, Rahme H. Long-standing increased bone turnover at the fixation points after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a positron emission tomography (PET) study of 8 patients. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:921–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dasa V, Adbel-Nabi H, Anders MJ, Mihalko WM. F-18 fluoride positron emission tomography of the hip for osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop. 2008;466:1081–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rüdisüli A, Müller-Brand J. Spectrum of findings in SPECT-CT of the feet—a review of 54 patients with pain as the main referring symptom. Supplementum 47. Swiss Medical Forum. 10th Annual Congress of the Swiss Society Of Nuclear Medicine; 4–6 June 2009;9:21–2.

  16. Pagenstert GI, Barg A, Leumann AG, Rasch H, Müller-Brand J, Hintermann B, et al. SPECT-CT imaging in degenerative joint disease of the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1191–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Perkins A, Hilson A, Hall J. Global shortage of medical isotopes threatens nuclear medicine services. BMJ. 2008;337:a1577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stafford N. Isotope shortage is limiting nuclear medicine across Europe. BMJ. 2008;337:a1575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pneumaticos SG, Chatziioannou SN, Hipp JA, Moore WH, Esses SI. Low back pain: prediction of short-term outcome of facet joint injection with bone scintigraphy. Radiology. 2006;238:693–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zafra M, Ayala F, Gonzalez-Billalabeitia E, Vicente E, Gonzalez-Cabezas P, García T, et al. Impact of whole-body 18F-FDG PET on diagnostic and therapeutic management of medical oncology patients. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1678–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making. 1991;11:88–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoegerle S, Juengling F, Otte A, Altehoefer C, Moser EA, Nitzsche EU. Combined FDG and F-18-fluoride whole body PET: a feasible two-in-one approach to cancer imaging? Radiology. 1998;209:253–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hetzel M, Arslandemir C, König HH, Buck AK, Nüssle K, Glatting G, et al. F-18 NaF PET for detection of bone metastases in lung cancer: accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and impact on patient management. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:2206–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Krug B, Van Zanten A, Pirson AS, Crott R, Borght TV. Activity-based costing evaluation of a 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography study. Health Policy. 2009;92:234–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Aknowledgements

We thank Sabine Knöfel for all technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothee Rita Fischer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, D.R., Maquieira, G.J., Espinosa, N. et al. Therapeutic impact of [18F]fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography on patients with unclear foot pain. Skeletal Radiol 39, 987–997 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0875-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0875-7

Keywords

Navigation