Abstract
State-of-the-art CT scanners typically display two dose indices: CT dose index (CTDIvol [mGy]) and dose length product (DLP [mGy-cm]) based on one of two standard CTDI phantoms (16- or 32-cm diameter) used in the calculation of CTDIvol. CTDIvol represents the radiation produced by the CT scanner, not the radiation dose to an individual patient. Pediatric radiologists, aware of this discrepancy, have requested a method to estimate the CT patient dose based on the size of the pediatric patient or small adult. This paper describes the method developed by AAPM Task Group 204 to provide a better estimate of CT patient dose. These improved estimates of patient dose provide radiologists with a practical tool to better manage the radiation dose their patients receive. In the future, size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) received by the patient should be included in the patient’s electronic medical record to help radiologists better assess risk versus benefit for their patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC (1981) A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 8:488–495
Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Frush DP et al (2009) Image Gently vendor summit: working together for better estimates of pediatric radiation dose from CT. AJR 192:1169–1175
Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Code DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. AAPM Report No. 204. Available via http://www.aapm.org. Accessed 14 June 2011
Berdon WE, Slovis TL (2002) Where we are since ALARA and the series of articles on CT dose in children and risk of long-term cancers: what has changed? Pediatr Radiol 32:699
Slovis TL (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality? Radiology 223:5–6
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2002) Medical Electrical Equipment. Part 2–44: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC publication No. 60601-2-44, edn 2.1. IEC Central Office, Geneva
Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR 194:1611–1619
Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Roskopf M (2000) Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examination. Med Phys 27:838–844
Dixon RL (2003) A new look at CT dose measurement: beyond CTDI. Med Phys 30:1272–1280
Dixon RL (2006) Restructuring CT dosimetry – a realistic strategy for the future Requiem for the pencil chamber. Med Phys 33:3973–3976
Boone JM (2007) The trouble with CTD100. Med Phys 34:1364–1371
Patient dosimetry for x-rays used in medical imaging (2005) J ICRU Report 74. Available via http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/content/117/1-3/7.abstract. Accessed 15 June 2011
Bongartz G, Golding S, Jurik A et al (2004) European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. Available via http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/index.htm. Accessed 14 June 2011
Shrimpton PC, Hiller MC, Lewis MA et al (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980
Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995–2007. Radiology 258:164–173
Disclaimer
The supplement this article is part of is not sponsored by the industry. Mr. Strauss and Dr. Goske have no financial interest, investigational or off-label uses to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strauss, K.J., Goske, M.J. Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatr Radiol 41 (Suppl 2), 472 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2179-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2179-z