Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Raman chemical mapping reveals site of action of HIV protease inhibitors in HPV16 E6 expressing cervical carcinoma cells

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been shown that the HIV protease inhibitors indinavir and lopinavir may have activity against the human papilloma virus (HPV) type 16 inhibiting HPV E6-mediated proteasomal degradation of p53 in cultured cervical carcinoma cells. However, their mode and site of action is unknown. HPV-negative C33A cervical carcinoma cells and the same cells stably transfected with E6 (C33AE6) were exposed to indinavir and lopinavir at concentrations of 1 mM and 30 μM, respectively. The intracellular distribution of metabolites and metabolic changes induced by these treatments were investigated by Raman microspectroscopic imaging combined with the analysis of cell fractionation products by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS). A uniform cellular distribution of proteins was found in drug-treated cells irrespective of cell type. Indinavir was observed to co-localise with nucleic acid in the nucleus, but only in E6 expressing cells. Principal components analysis (PCA) score maps generated on the full Raman hypercube and the corresponding PCA loadings plots revealed that the majority of metabolic variations influenced by the drug exposure within the cells were associated with changes in nucleic acids. Analysis of cell fractionation products by LC-MS confirmed that the level of indinavir in nuclear extracts was approximately eight-fold greater than in the cytoplasm. These data demonstrate that indinavir undergoes enhanced nuclear accumulation in E6-expressing cells, which suggests that this is the most likely site of action for this compound against HPV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. zur Hausen H (1996) Papillomavirus infections—a major cause of human cancers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1288:55–78

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Villiers EM (1989) Heterogeneity of the human papillomavirus group. J Virol 63:4898

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, Levine AJ, Howley PM (1990) The e6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell 63:1129–1136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, Ferris DG, Jenkins D, Schuind A, Zahaf T, Innis B, Naud P, De Carvalho NS, Roteli-Martins CM, Teixeira J, Blatter MM, Korn AP, Quint W, Dubin G (2004) Efficacy of a bivalent l1 virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 346:1757–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Herrero R, Castellsague X, Shah KV, Snijders PJF, Meijer CJLM (2003) Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 348:518–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Villa LL, Costa RLR, Petta CA, Andrade RP, Ault KA, Giuliano AR, Wheeler CM, Koutsky LA, Malm C, Lehtinen M, Skjeldestad FE, Olsson SE, Steinwall M, Brown DR, Kurman RJ, Ronnett RM, Stoler MH, Ferenczy A, Harper DM, Tamms GM, Yu J, Lupinacci L, Railkar R, Taddeo FJ, Jansen KU, Essser MT, Sings HL, Saah AJ, Barr E (2005) Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) l1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial. Lancet Oncol 6:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2006) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367:489–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. zur Hausen H (2000) Papillomaviruses causing cancer: evasion from host-cell control in early events in carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:690–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hampson L, Kitchener HC, Hampson IN (2006) Specific HIV protease inhibitors inhibit the ability of hpv16 e6 to degrade p53 and selectively kill e6-dependent cervical carcinoma cells in vitro. Antivir Ther 11:813–825

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim D-H, Jarvis RM, Xu Y, Oliver AW, Allwood JW, Hampson L, Hampson IN, Goodacre R (2010) Combining metabolic fingerprinting and footprinting to understand the phenotypic response of hpv16 e6 expressing cervical carcinoma cells exposed to the hiv anti-viral drug lopinavir. Analyst 135:1235–1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chow WA, Jiang C, Guan M (2009) Anti-HIV drugs for cancer therapeutics: back to the future? Lancet Oncol 10:61–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampson L, El Hady E, Moore JV, Kitchener H, Hampson IN (2001) The HPV16 e6 and e7 proteins and the radiation resistance of cervical carcinoma. FASEB J 15:1445–1447

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wold H (1966) Multivariate analysis. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sumner LW, Mendes P, Dixon RA (2003) Plant metabolomics: large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era. Phytochemistry 62:817–836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laemmli UK (1986) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wrona M, Mauriala T, Bateman KP, Mortishire Smith RJ, O'Connor D (2005) All-in-one analysis for metabolite identification using liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry with collision energy switching. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:2597–2602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bateman KP, Castro-Perez J, Wrona M, Shockcor JP, Yu K, Oballa R, Nicoll-Griffith DA (2007) Mse with mass defect filtering for in vitro and in vivo metabolite identification. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2:1485–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Banks L, Pim D, Thomas M (2003) Viruses and the 26S proteasome: hacking into destruction. Trends Biochem Sci 28:452–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mantovani F, Banks L (1999) The interaction between p53 and papillomaviruses. Semin Cancer Biol 9:387–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allwood JW, Goodacre R (2010) An introduction to liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry instrumentation applied in plant metabolomic analyses. Phytochem Anal 21:33–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ellis DI, Goodacre R (2006) Metabolic fingerprinting in disease diagnosis: biomedical applications of infrared and Raman spectroscopy. Analyst 131:875–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Clark D, Sasic S (2006) Chemical images: technical approaches and issues. CytometryA 69a:815–824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Buschman HP, Deinum G, Morz JT, Fizmaurice M, Kramer JR, van der Laarse A, Bruschke AV, Feld MS (2001) Raman microspectroscopy of human coronary atherosclerosis: biochemical assessment of cellular and extracellular morphologic structures in situ. Cardiovasc Pathol 10:69–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris AT, Lungari A, Needham CJ, Smith SL, Lones MA, Fisher SE, Yang XB, Cooper N, Kirkham J, Smith DA, Martin-Hirsch DP, High AS (2009) Potential for Raman spectroscopy to provide cancer screening using a peripheral blood sample. Head Neck Oncol 1:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hawi SR, Campbell WB, Balla AK, Murphy R (1996) Characterization of normal and malignant human hepatocytes by Raman microspectroscopy. Cancer Lett 110:35–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shafer-Peltier KE, Haka AS, Fitzmaurice M, Crowe J, Myles J, Dasari RR, Feld MS (2002) Raman microspectroscopic model of human breast tissue: implications for breast cancer diagnosis in vivo. J Raman Spectrosc 33:552–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ellis EI, Dunn WB, Griffin JL, Allwood JW, Goodacre R (2007) Metabolic fingerprinting as a diagnostic tool. Pharmacogenomics 8:1243–1266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahadevan-Jansen A, Richards-Kortum R (1997) Raman spectroscopy for cancer detection: a review. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 6:2722–2728

    Google Scholar 

  30. Beljebbar A, Sockalingum GD, Morjani H, Manfait M (1999) Raman and sers microspectroscopy on living cells: a promising tool towards cellular-drug response and medical diagnosis. Proc SPIE 3608:175–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kang E, Wang H, Kwon IK, Robinson J, Park K, Cheng JX (2006) In situ visualization of paclitaxel distribution and release by coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Anal Chem 78:8036–8043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Short KW, Carpenter S, Freyer JP, Mourant JR (2005) Raman spectroscopy detects biochemical changes due to proliferation in mammalian cell cutures. Biophys J 88:4274–4288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Uzunbajakava N, Lenferink A, Kraan Y, Willekens B, Vrensen G, Greve J, Otto C (2003) Nonresonant raman imaging of protein distribution in single human cells. Biopolymers 72:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wan F, Miao X, Quraishi I, Kennedy V, Creek KE, Pirisi L (2008) Gene expression changes during HPV-mediated carcinogenesis: a comparison between an in vitro cell model and cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 123:32–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Martin CM, Astbury K, McEvoy L, O'Toole S, Sheils O, O'Leary JJ (2009) Gene expression profiling in cervical cancer: identification of novel markers for disease diagnosis and therapy. Meth Mol Biol 511:333–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Goodacre R, Vaidyanathan S, Dunn WB, Harrigan GG, Kell DB (2004) Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. Trends Biotechnol 22:245–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Faolain EO, Hunter MB, Byrne JM, Kelehan P, Byrne HJ, Lyng FM (2005) The potential of vibrational spectroscopy in the early detection of cervical cancer: an exciting emerging field. Proc SPIE 5826:25–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Notingher IN, Verrier S, Haque S, Polak JM, Hench LL (2003) Spectroscopic study of human lung epithelial cells (a549) in culture: living cells versus dead cells. Biopolymers 72:230–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by an ORS award to D-H.K. R.M.J. is very thankful to the UK BBSRC for funding. J.W.A., E.M.-E. and R.G. are grateful to the EU-funded project, Metabolomics for Plants Health and OutReach (META-PHOR: FOOD-CT-2006-036220), for financial support. R.G. is grateful to both the UK BBSRC and EPSRC for financial support of the MCISB. The authors also acknowledge the support of the Humane Research Trust, the Caring Cancer Research Trust and Cancer Research UK.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Royston Goodacre.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

The microscope offers focussing and data collecting optics for both spectral and white light images from the cell. After the Raman spectrum is collected from the first point, the incident light is moved in a raster pattern across the grid in a diffraction-limited spot size (1 × 1 μm), then another spectrum is taken. This process is continued until the area of the cell assigned by the operator has been covered (PDF 480 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, DH., Jarvis, R.M., Allwood, J.W. et al. Raman chemical mapping reveals site of action of HIV protease inhibitors in HPV16 E6 expressing cervical carcinoma cells. Anal Bioanal Chem 398, 3051–3061 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4283-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4283-6

Keywords

Navigation