Abstract
The Genetics Panel of the National Academy of Sciences’ Committee on Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation (BEAR) recommended the adoption of the linear dose–response model in 1956, abandoning the threshold dose–response for genetic risk assessments. This recommendation was quickly generalized to include somatic cells for cancer risk assessment and later was instrumental in the adoption of linearity for carcinogen risk assessment by the Environmental Protection Agency. The Genetics Panel failed to provide any scientific assessment to support this recommendation and refused to do so when later challenged by other leading scientists. Thus, the linearity model used in cancer risk assessment was based on ideology rather than science and originated with the recommendation of the NAS BEAR Committee Genetics Panel. Historical documentation in support of these conclusions is provided in the transcripts of the Panel meetings and in previously unexamined correspondence among Panel members.
References
Albert RE (1994) Carcinogen risk assessment in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Crit Rev Toxicol 24(1):75–85
Anonymous (1956) Genetic effects of atomic radiation. Summary Report of the Committee on Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation by the National Academy of Sciences, BEAR I Genetics Panel (W. Weaver, Chair). Sci 123:1157–1164. [Erratum, Science 124:170]
Calabrese EJ (2011a) Muller’s Nobel lecture on dose–response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science? Arch Toxicol 85(12):1495–1498
Calabrese EJ (2011b) Key studies used to support cancer risk assessment questioned. Environ Mol Mutagen 52(8):595–606
Calabrese EJ (2012) Muller’s Nobel Prize lecture: when ideology prevailed over science. Toxicol Sci 126:1–4
Calabrese EJ (2013a) Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose–response concept. Arch Toxicol 87:1621–1633
Calabrese EJ (2013b) How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response. Arch Toxicol 87(12):2063–2081
National Academy of Science (NAS)/National Research Council (NRC) (1956) The biological effects of atomic radiation. A report to the public. Washington
Acknowledgments
Research activities in the area of dose–response have been funded by the United States Air Force (FA9550-13-1-0047) and ExxonMobil Foundation over a number of years. However, such funding support has not been used for the present manuscript.
Conflict of interest
Author declares no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calabrese, E.J. An abuse of risk assessment: how regulatory agencies improperly adopted LNT for cancer risk assessment. Arch Toxicol 89, 647–648 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-015-1454-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-015-1454-4