Skip to main content
Log in

Technetium pertechnetate esophageal imaging for detection of Barrett's esophagus

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the utility of99mTc pertechnetate esophageal scintigraphy for identifying Barrett's esophagus. Seventeen patients with Barrett's esophagus and seven patients with reflux esophagitis were studied. Eight of 17 patients with Barrett's esophagus had a positive image (sensitivity 47%). In contrast, none of the seven patients with esophagitis had a positive image (specificity 100%). Pentagastrin did not have a significant effect on the sensitivity. There was no correlation between the type of Barrett's epithelium and the sensitivity of the imaging results. However, the test is more frequently positive in those patients with more extensive disease. Our study indicates that technetium pertechnetate imaging should not be used as a screening test for the detection of Barrett's esophagus in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, as the negative predictive value of the test is limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bozymski EM, Herlihy KJ, Orlando RC: Barrett's esophagus. Ann Intern Med 97:103–107, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spechler SJ, Goyal RK: Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med 315:362–371, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sjogren RW, Johnson LF: Barrett's esophagus: A review. Am J Med 74:313–320, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Messian RA, Hermos JA, Robbins AH, Freidlandrer DM, Schimmel EM: Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 69:458–466, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Achkar E, Carey W: The cost of surveillance for adenocarcinoma complicating Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 83:291–294, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schnell T, Sontag S, Chejfec G, Miller T: Detection of Barrett's esophagus and curable esophageal adenocarcinoma by endoscopic screening based on GER symptoms: Can it be cost effective? Gastroenterology 94:A411, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sfakianakis GN, Conway JJ: Detection of ectopic gastric mucosa in Meckel's diverticulum and in other aberrations by scintigraphy: Indications and methods—a 10-year experience. J Nucl Med 22:732–738, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berquist TH, Nolan NG, Carlson HC, Stephens DH: Diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus by pertechnetate scintigraphy. Mayo Clin Proc 48:276–279, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mangla JC, Brown M: Diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus by pertechnetate radionuclide. Am J Dig Dis 21:324–328, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paull A, Trier JS, Dalton MD, Camp RC, Loebb P, Goyal RK: The histologic spectrum of Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med 295:476–480, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berquist TH, Nolan NG, Stephens DH, Carlson HC: Radioisotope scintigraphy in diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus. Am J Roentgenol 123:401–411, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kweka EL, O'Neill M, Cooney C, O'Sullivan G: Imaging Barrett's esophagus. Clin Radiol 38:415–418, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sager IV, Piccone JM: The effect of cimetidine on blood clearance, gastric uptake and secretion of 99m-Tcpertechnetate in dogs. Radiology 139:729–731, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yegelwel, E.J., Bushnell, D.L., Fisher, S.G. et al. Technetium pertechnetate esophageal imaging for detection of Barrett's esophagus. Digest Dis Sci 34, 1075–1078 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536377

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536377

Key words

Navigation