Skip to main content
Log in

Is the addition of ECG gating to technetium-99m sestamibi SPET of value in the assessment of myocardial viability?

An evaluation based on two-dimensional echocardiography following revascularization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of ECG gating to technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission tomography (SPET) perfusion imaging assists the prediction of recovery of regional wall motion abnormalities after revascularization. Thirty-six patients with coronary artery disease were included in the study. All had wall motion abnormalities, and 31 (86%) had a clinical history of myocardial infarction. Coronary artery bypass surgery was performed in 18 patients and angioplasty in the remainder. All underwent ECG-gated and non-gated SPET at rest and after intravenous dipyridamole. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed at a mean of 27 days before revascularization and at a mean of 69 days following revascularization to assess segmental wall motion changes. Perfusion prior to revascularization was analysed qualitatively and quantitatively on gated and non-gated SPET, and the results compared with those of echocardiography. Bullseye parameters were obtained from a normal database, generated from data in 40 normal volunteers, using dipyridamole ECG-gated and non-gated sestamibi SPET. There was good concordance between gated and non-gated qualitative analysis (79% with kappa=0.65) for normal, viable or necrotic segments. Gated SPET predicted functional recovery in 27 of 35 (77%) segments showing echocardiographic improvement while non-gated SPET did so in 30 of 39 (77%) such segments. Gated SPET predicted no functional recovery in 20 of 45 (44%) segments that did not show improved wall motion after revascularization, while with non-gated SPET the figure was 18 of 51 (35%). The positive predictive values of gated and non-gated SPET with regard to the recovery of wall motion following revascularization were 52% and 48%, while the negative predictive values were 71% and 67%, respectively.99mTc-sestamibi had a low predictive value for recovery of function if visual assessment was used in the analysis of SPET data. Quantitative bullseye sestamibi parameters (defect extension and severity, reversibility and percentage change in extension), from gated or non-gated studies, appear best to distinguish which segments will display improved motility on the echocardiogram after revascularization. The addition of ECG gating does not significantly increase the predictive value of SPET imaging with regard to recovery of function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iskandrian A, Heo J, Stanberry C. When is myocardial viability an important clinical issue?.J Nucl Med 1994; 35 Suppl: 4S-7S.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hendel R. Single-photon imaging for the assessment of myocardial viability.J Nucl Med 1994; 35 Suppl: 23S-31S.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonow R, Dilsizian V. Thallium-201 and technetium-99m-sestamibin for assessing viable myocardium.J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 815–818.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman I, Grunwald A, Hoory S, Bodenheimer M. Effect of coronary occlusion and myocardial viability on myocardial activity of technetium-99m-sestamibi.J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 292–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. González P, Massardo T, Maiers E, et al. Tc-99m-sestamibi perfusion imaging to assess myocardial viability, compared to improvement on echocardiographic wall motion after revascularization.Eur J Nucl Med 1994; 21: S103.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein L, Garcia EV, DePuey G, et al. Reversibility bullseye: a new polar bullseye map to quantify reversibility of stress induced SPECT T1-201 myocardial perfusion defects [abstract). J Nucl Med 1987; 28: 642.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Massardo T, Gonzalez P, Yovanovich J, et al. Evaluación de revascularización coronaria: comparación entre perfusion con sestamibi Tc99m gatillado y ecografia-amrinona como predictores de viabilidad.Rev Med Chile 1994; 122: 1353–1361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sackett DL, Haynes RD, Guyatt GH, Tugwell PT. Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine, 2nd edn. Boston: Little Brown & Co, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis.Semin Nucl Med 1978; 8: 283–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Altehoefer C, Vom Dahl J, Biedermabnn M, et al. Significance of defect severity in technetium-99m-MIBI SPECT at rest to assess myocardial viability: comparison with fluorine-18-FDG PET.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 569–574.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Udelson JE, Coleman P, Metherall J, et al. Predicting recovery of severe regional ventricular dysfunction. Comparison of resting scintigraphy with201T1 and99mTc sestamibi.Circulation 1994; 89: 2552–2561.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mannting F, Morgan-Mannting MG. Gated SPECT with technetium-99m-sestamibi for assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities.J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 601–608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Avery P, Hudson N, Hubner P. Evaluation of changes in myocardial perfusion and function on exercise in patients with coronary artery disease by gated MIBI scintigraphy.Br Heart J 1993; 70: 22–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chua T, Kiat H, Germano G, et al. Gated technetium-99m-sestamibi for simultaneous assessment of stress myocardial perfusion, postexercise regional ventricular function and myocardial viability. Correlation with echocardiography and rest thallium-201 scintigraphy.J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1107–1114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trischler MD, Niggel JB, Battle RW, Fairbank JT, Brown KA. Validation of global and segmental left ventricular contractile function using gated planat technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging.J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 141–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuocolo A, Pace L, Nicolai E, et al. Identification of viable myocardium by ECG-gated technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) imaging: relation to thallium-201 reinjection.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 153P.

  18. Maurea S, Cuocolo A, Soricelli A, et al. Enhanced detection of viable myocardium by technetium-99m-MIBI imaging after nitrate administration in chronic coronary artery disease.J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 1945–1952.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maurea S, Cuocolo A, Soricelli A, et al. Myocardial viability index in chronic coronary artery disease: technetium-99m-methoxyisobutylisonitrile redistribution.J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 1953–1960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bisi G, Sciagra R, Santoro GM, Rossi V, Fazzini PE. Technetium 99m-sestamibi imaging with nitrate infusion to detect viable hibernating myocardium and predict postrevascularization recovery.J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 1994–2000.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cuocolo A, Pace L, Ricciardelli B, et al. Identification of viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: comparison of thallium-201 scintigraphy with reinjection and technetium-99m-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile.J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 505–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dilsizian V, Arrighi JA, Diodati JG, et al. Myocardial viability in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Comparison of technetium-99m-sestamibi with thallium reinjection and (18F)fluorodeoxyglucose.Circulation 1994; 89: 578–587.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marzullo P, Sambucetti G, Parodi O. The role of sestamibi scintigraphy in the radioisotopic assessment of myocardial viability.J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 1925–1930.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gang H, Lucignani G, Landoni C, et al. Rest redistribution of99mTc-MIBI in patients with coronary artery disease assessed by SPECT: comparison with the distribution of [18F]FDG assessed by PET.J Nucl Biol Med 1994; 38: 540–544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maublant JC, Citron B, Lipiecki J, et al. Rest technetium 99m-sestamibi tomoscintigraphy in hibernating myocardium.Am Heart J 1995; 129: 306–314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Soufer R, Dey HM, Ng C, Zaret B. Comparison of sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography with positron emission tomography for estimating left ventricular myocardial viability.Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 1214–1219.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Corbett JR, McGhie AI, Faber TL. Perfusion defect size and severity using gated sestamibi: comparison to ungated imaging.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 155P.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González, P., Massardo, T., Muñoz, A. et al. Is the addition of ECG gating to technetium-99m sestamibi SPET of value in the assessment of myocardial viability?. Eur J Nucl Med 23, 1315–1322 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01367586

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01367586

Key words

Navigation