Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ventilation-perfusion lung scanning and spiral computed tomography of the lungs: Competing or complementary modalities?

  • Review article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recently developed technique of spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is being used for the detection of pulmonary emboli (PE), and several studies have assessed its accuracy using pulmonary angiography as the gold standard. CTA shows a high level of accuracy in the detection of pulmonary emboli in segmental or larger central vessels. The specificity is high enough to eliminate the requirement for angiography if a positive CTA result is found. The main factor limiting the sensitivity of CTA is the frequency of peripheral emboli in the vessels outside the central chest field covered by CTA. The incidence of such peripheral emboli varies in different reports from 0% to 36%, and their significance remains arguable. Interpretative criteria for V/Q-lung scintigraphy have been refined as a result of the lessons learned from the MOPED study. Using these modified criteria, and taking into account the prior probability of PE based on the presence or absence of clinical risk factors, treatment decisions can be reasonably made in patients in the following categories: those with normal lung scans, those with high probability scans and high prior probability of PE, and those with low probability scans and low clinical suspicion. Patients with intermediate probability or indeterminate scans, and those in whom the scan results conflict with the clinical expectation, will need further tests. Ultrasound examination of the leg veins, if positive, will select a further subgroup of patients for active treatment. Patients with a negative or inconclusive ultrasound result, who previously have been candidates for pulmonary angiography, can now go on to CTA. The advantages in specificity which CTA offers will make it an important part of the diagnostic workup for selected patients, but in view of its increased cost and high radiation dose compared with V/Q scintigraphy, the argument that CTA should completely replace lung scintigraphy is currently unsupportable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, et al. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique - comparison with pulmonary angiography.Radiology 1992; 185: 381–387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Teigen CL, Maus TP, Sheedy PF, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with electron-beam CT.Radiology 1993; 188: 839–845.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurney JW. No fooling around: direct visualization of pulmonary embolism.Radiology 1993; 188: 618–619.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The PIOPED investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism.JAMA 1990; 263: 2753–2759.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gottschalk A, Sostman HD, Coleman RE, et al. Ventilationperfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. 11. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretations.J Nucl Med 1993;34:1119–1126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sostman HD, Coleman RE, Delong DM, et al. Evaluation of revised criteria for ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.Radiology 1994; 193:103–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Freitas JE, Sarosi MG, Nagle CC, et al. Modified PIOPED criteria used in clinical practice.J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 1573–1578.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Worsley DF, Alavi A. Comprehensive analysis of the results of the PIOPED study.J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 2380–2387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sostman HD, Gottschalk A. The Stripe sign: a new sign for diagnosis of nonembolic defects on pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy.Radiology 1982; 142: 737–741.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Webber MM, Gomes AS, Roe D, et al. Comparison of Biello, McNeil, and PIOPED criteria for the diagnosis of pulmonary emboli on lung scans.Am J Radiol 1990; 154: 975–981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Coates G, et al. A new noninvasive management strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 2549–2555.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kipper MS, Moser KM, Kortman KE, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with suspected embolism and a normal lung scan.Chest 1982; 82: 411–415.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee ME, Biello DR, Kumar B, et al. ‘Low probability’ ventilation-perfusion scintigrams: clinical outcomes in 99 patients.Radiology 1985; 156: 497–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis.Am J Radiol 1995; 164: 1369–1374.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Teigen CL, Maus TP, Sheedy PF, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and comparison with pulmonary angiography.Radiology 1995; 194: 313–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rémy-Jardin M, Rémy J, Cauvain O, et al. Diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism with helical CT: role of two-dimensional multiplanar reformations.Am J Radiol 1995; 165: 1131–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR, et al. Severity of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary arteriography: implications for spiral and ultrafast CT [abstract].Radiology 1994; 193(P): 352.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wheeler HB, Anderson FA, Cardullo PA, et al. Suspected deep vein thrombosis.Arch Surg 1982; 117: 1206–1209.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huisman MV Buller HR, Ten Cate JW, et al. Serial impedance plethysmography for suspected deep venous thrombosis in outpatients.N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 823–828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Rossum AB, Treumiet FE, Kieft GJ, et al. Role of spiral volumetric computed tomography scanning in the assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism and an abnormal ventilation/perfusion lung scan.Thorax 1996; 51: 23–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mannion RAJ, Bury RF, Chalmers AG. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism - the role of spiral CT where scintigraphy is inconclusive. Submitted for publication 1996.

  22. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism.Circulation 1992; 85: 462–468.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Henry JW, Relyea B, Stein PD. Continuing risk of thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms.Chest 1995; 107: 1375–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quinn MF, Lundell CJ, Klotz TA, et al. Reliability of selective pulmonary arteriography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.Am J Radiol 1987; 149: 469–471.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sostman HD, Rapoport S, Gottschalk A, et al. Imaging of pulmonary embolism.Invest Radiol 1986; 21: 443–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Urokinase Pulmonary Embolism Trial. A national co-operative study.Circulation 1973; 47 Suppl 2: 1–108.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stein PD, Henry JW, Relyea B. Untreated patients with pulmonary embolism: outcome, clinical, and laboratory assessment.Chest 1995; 107: 931–935.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dalen JE, Brooks HL, Johnson LW et al. Pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism: indications, techniques, and results in 367 patients.Am Heart J 1971; 81: 175–185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mills SR, Jackson DC, Older RA, et al. The incidence, etiologies, and avoidance of complications of pulmonary angiography in a large series.Radiology 1980; 136: 295–299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oudkerk M, van Beek EJR, van Putten WLJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of various strategies in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism.Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 947–954.]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hirsh J. Diagnosis of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 45C-49C.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cronan JJ. Venous thromboembolic disease: the role of US.Radiology 1993; 186: 619–630.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gefter WB, Hatabu H, Holland GA, et al. Pulmonary thromboembolism: recent developments in diagnosis with CT and MR imaging.Radiology 1995; 197: 561–574.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dorfman GS Cronan JJ, Tupper TB, et al. Occult pulmonary embolism: a common occurrence in deep venous thrombosis.Am J Radiol 1987; 148: 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kalodiki E, Domjan J, Nicolaides AN, et al. V/Q defects and deep venous thrombosis following total hip replacement.Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 400–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, et al. Diagnostic value of ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.Chest 1985; 88: 819–828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, et al. Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan.Ann Intern Med 1983; 98: 891–899.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Meibers DJ, Baldridge ED, Ruoff BA, et al. The significance of calf muscle venous thrombosis.J Vase Surg 1988; 12: 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Philbrick JT Becker DM. Calf deep venous thrombosis: a wolf in sheep's clothing?Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 2131–2138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moser KM, LeMoine JR. Is embolic risk conditioned by location of deep venous thrombosis? Ann Intern Med 1981; 94: 439–444.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Havig O. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: source of pulmonary emboli. Acta Clin Scand 1977; 478: 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gray HW, McKillop JH, Bessent RG, et al. Lung scanning for pulmonary embolism: clinical and pulmonary angiographic correlations.Q J Med 1990; 283: 1135–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schluger N, Henschke C, King T, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism at a large teaching hospital.J Thorac Imaging 1994;9:180–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Robinson PJ. Lung scintigraphy - doubt and certainty in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.Clin Radiol 1989; 40: 557–560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dalen JE. When can treatment be withheld in patients with suspected pumonary embolism?Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 1415–1418.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, et al. Survey of CT practice in the UK - part 2: dosimetric aspects. Documents of the NRPB, Didcot 1991.

  47. Vetter RJ, Gray JE, Kofler JM. Patient radiation doses at a large tertiary care medical centre.Radiat Prot Dosim 1991; 36:247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  48. National Radiological Protection Board. Protection of the patient in X-ray computed tomography. Documents of the NRPB 1992, vol 3, no 4 (NRPB, Chilton).

  49. Specker BL, Saenger EL, Buncher CR, et al. Pulmonary embolism and lung scanning: cost-effectiveness and benefit: risk.JNucl Med 1987; 28: 1521–1530.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Perrier A, Bounameaux H, Morabia A, et al. Contribution of D-dimer plasma measurement and lower limb venous ultrasound to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a decision analysis model.Am Heart J 1994; 127: 624–635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Quinn RJ, Nour R, Butler SP, et al. Pulmonary embolism in patients with intermediate probability lung scans: diagnosis with Doppler venous US and D-dimer measurement.Radiology 1994; 190: 509–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hatabu H, Gaa J, Kim D, et al. Pulmonary perfusion and angiography: MRI evaluation by breath-hold contrast-enhanced 3D FISP with short TR and TE. Proceedings of the fourth scientific meeting of the society for magnetic resonance in medicine, New York, 1996; p 8.

  53. Debatin JF, Leung DA, Steiner P, et al. Contrast enhanced 3D MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries in under 20 seconds. Proceedings of the fourth scientific meeting of the Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, New York, 1996; p 161.

  54. Parker AJ, Drum DE. Feldstein ML, et al. Lung scan evaluation of thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism.J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 364–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Palevsky HI, Alavi A, Zukerberg BW et al. Defining a role for thrombolytic therapy in the management of pulmonary embolism.JNucl Med 1995; 36: 369–370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Radiology Department, St. James's University Hospital, LS9 7TF, Leeds, UK

    Philip J. A. Robinson

Authors
  1. Philip J. A. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, P.J.A. Ventilation-perfusion lung scanning and spiral computed tomography of the lungs: Competing or complementary modalities?. Eur J Nucl Med 23, 1547–1553 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254484

Key words

Search

Navigation