Skip to main content
Log in

Qualitative [18F]FDG positron emission tomography in primary breast cancer: clinical relevance and practicability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) is of potential value for the diagnosis of malignant tumours. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of FDG PET in patients with breast tumours, appraising its applicability in visualising primary carcinomas and regional metastases in a clinical setting. Results of FDG PET were compared with those of mammography, breast ultrasonography and histology in 30 patients with inconclusive breast findings. For PET, transmission and emission images were taken in one or two scan positions, depending on the available time and the clinical status of patients. PET showed focal FDG uptake with high contrast in 21 of 23 primary carcinomas. In one patient, only PET correctly visualized multifocal disease (three foci, Ø 0.4–1 cm). The accuracy of PET in the detection of primary breast cancer was 90%, and in the detection of involved axillary lymph nodes, 94%. All metastases (lymph nodes, lungs, bones, soft tissues) covered by the field of view and demonstrated by other methods (X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scan) showed FDG uptake. In three patients, only PET initiated further diagnostic procedures. The results indicate that FDG PET can provide a rapid diagnostic study (45–60 min) and allows accurate tumour staging of several organ systems for primary tumour and metastases with a single imaging study in a routine clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells.Science 1956; 123: 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Strauss LG, Conti PS. The application of PET in clinical oncology.J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 623–664.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pietrzyk U, Scheidhauer K, Scharl A, Schuster A, Schicha H. Presurgial visualization of primary breast carcinoma with PET emission and transmission imaging.J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 1882–1884.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adler LP, Crowe JP, al Kaisi NK, Sunshine JL. Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with (F-18)-2-deoxy2-fluoro-d-glucose PET.Radiology 1993; 187: 743–750.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glaspy JA, Hawkins R, Hoh CK, Phelps ME. Use of positron emission tomography in oncology.Oncology-Huntigt 1993; 7: 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wienhard K, Eriksson L, Grootoonk S, Casey M, Pietrzyk U, Heiss WD. Performance evaluation of the position scanner ECAT EXACT.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 804–813.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Stöcklin G. Efficient stereospecific synthesis of no-carrier-added 2-(18F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution.J Nucl Med 1986; 27: 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Heiss WD. Three-dimensional alignment of functional and morphological tomograms.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14: 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Fink G, Jacobs A, Mielke R, Slansky J, Würker M, Heiss WD. An interactive technique for threedimensional image registration: validation for PET, SPECT, MRI, and CT brain studies.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 2011–2018.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wahl RL, Cody RL, Hutchins GD, Mugett EE. Primary and metastatic breast carcinoma: initial clinical evaluation with PET with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2-(F-18)-fluoro2-deoxy-d-glucose.Radiology 1991; 179: 765–770.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lichter AS, Adler DD, August DA, Honig SF, Lippmann ME, Schottenfeld DA. Breast Cancer. In: Hoskins JW, Perez CA, Young RC, eds.Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1992: 827–891.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Minn H, Leskinen-Kallio S, Lindholm P, Bergman J, Ruolsalainen U, Teras M, Haaparanta M. (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in tumours: kinetic vs. steady-state methods with reference to plasma insulin.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17: 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wahl R, Henry C, Ethier S. Serum glucose: effects on tumour and normal tissue accumulation of 2-(F-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose in rodents with mammary carcinoma.Radiology 1992; 183: 643–647.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D'Orsi C. To follow or not to follow, that is the question.Radiology 1992; 184: 306.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kopans D. The accuracy of mammographic interpretation.N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1521–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elmore J, Wells C, Lee C, Howard D, Feinstein A. Variability in radiologists' interpretation of mammograms.N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1493–1499.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kopans D. Breast imaging and the standard of care for the symptomatic patient.Radiology 1993; 187: 608–611.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography.Radiology 1991; 179: 463–468.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases.Radiology 1992; 184: 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheidhauer, K., Scharl, A., Pietrzyk, U. et al. Qualitative [18F]FDG positron emission tomography in primary breast cancer: clinical relevance and practicability. Eur J Nucl Med 23, 618–623 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00834522

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00834522

Key words

Navigation