TABLE 3

Predictors of Clinically Relevant Change in Management Recommendations After Evaluation of Bone Lesions by 18F-FDG PET Plus ceCT Instead of BS Plus ceCT

Univariable analysis
PredictorSame treatment, n = 86 (84.3%)Difference in treatment, n = 16 (15.7%)*PAUC95% CI
Ductal histology of primary tumor (n)
 No16 (88.9%)2 (11.1%)0.730.530.44–0.62
 Yes70 (83.3%)14 (16.7%)
Hormone receptor status of primary  tumor (n)
 Negative12 (70.6%)5 (29.4%)0.140.590.46–0.71
 Positive74 (87.1%)11 (12.9%)
HER2 status of primary tumor (n)
 Negative67 (85.9%)11 (14.1%)0.520.550.42–0.67
 Positive19 (79.2%)5 (20.8%)
Grade of primary tumor (n)
 Grade 1 or 257 (85.1%)10 (14.9%)0.770.530.39–0.66
 Grade 327 (81.8%)6 (18.2%)
Suspicion of bone metastases (n)
 No63 (85.1%)11 (14.9%)0.760.520.40–0.65
 Yes23 (82.1%)5 (17.9%)
Relapse time (y)0.700.530.37–0.69
 Median67
 25th–75th percentiles2%–9%4%–10%
Bone lesions on CT (n)0.0180.680.58–0.79
 Median41
 25th–75th percentiles0%–20%0%–1%
  • * For this analysis of potential predictors of management recommendations based on 18F-FDG PET, 16 patients were included. Patient with changed recommendations based on BS was not included.

  • AUC = area under receiver-operating-characteristic curve.