TABLE 2

Summary of DAT Results

RegionPD vs. MSA-PPD vs. PSPPD vs. MSA-CPD vs. CBSMSA-P vs. PSPMSA-P vs. MSA-CPSP vs. CBS
Caudateg = −0.39*g = −1.08*g = 0.73g = −0.33g = −0.37g = 1.20Insufficient data, n = 1/17
CI = −0.77 to −0.01*CI = −1.52 to −0.64*CI = −1.18 to 2.63CI = −1.08 to 0.43CI = −1.13 to 0.39CI = −0.20 to 2.59
n = 10/609, I2 = 63.2%*n = 11/356, I2 = 56.6%*n = 2/92, I2 = 0.0%n = 3/122, I2 = 0.0%n = 5/114, I2 = 47.7%n = 3/99, I2 = 45.6%
Putameng = −0.27g = −0.86*g = 1.51g = 0.55g = −0.47g = 1.87*Insufficient data, n = 1/17
CI = −0.58 to 0.04CI = −1.50 to −0.21*CI = −0.57 to 3.59CI = −0.42 to 1.53CI = −1.22 to 0.28CI = 0.46 to 3.29*
n = 9/451, I2 = 29.5%n = 8/291, I2 = 73.3%*n = 2/92, I2 = 0.0%n = 3/122, I2 = 26.8%n = 4/101, I2 = 27.5%n = 3/99, I2 = 34.1%*
Striatumg = −0.34g = −1.05*Insufficient data, n = 1/55g = 0.98g = −0.70*g = 1.46*g = 1.30
CI = −1.01 to 0.33CI = −1.68 to −0.43*CI = −0.65 to 2.62CI = −1.21 to −0.19*CI = 0.23 to 2.68*CI = −5.49 to 8.09
n = 4/255, I2 = 46.6%n = 9/390, I2 = 73.3%*n = 4/142, I2 = 81.3%n = 3/83, I2 = 0.0%*n = 4/133, I2 = 63.5%*n = 2/29, I2 = 40.1%
  • CI = 95% confidence interval for g; n = number of studies or patients; I2 = heterogeneity index.

  • There were no available studies that have compared MSA-C patients with PSP or CBS patients. There were also insufficient data for MSA-P vs. CBS comparison. Statistically significant comparisons are indicated with stars. Hemispheric values and ratios are presented in Supplemental Table 6.