TABLE 2

Studies Investigating Response-Adapted Therapy in HL

Results
StudyPatient populationMethodologyPET+PET−
Gallamini, 2011 (51)165 HL patients (78 limited, 87 advanced)PET-2 (ABVD); PET− completed 6 more cycles; PET+ escalated to 4 cycles of BEACOPP, 4 cycles BEACOPP2-y FFS: 65%2-y FFS: 92%
Raemaekers, 2014 (26)1,137 early-HL patients (444 favorable, 693 unfavorable)PET-2 (ABVD); PET− completed 2 more cycles if favorable, 4 more cycles if unfavorable; PET+ escalated to 2 cycles BEACOPP, radiotherapyNANA
Casasnovas, 2015 (23)782 advanced/bulky-HL patientsPET-2 (BEACOPP); PET− deescalated to 4 cycles ABVD; PET+ completed 4 more cycles; controls completed 6 cycles BEACOPP2-y PFS: 72.9%2-y PFS: 92.8%
Ganesan, 2015 (22)50 advanced/bulky-HL patientsPET-2 (ABVD); PET− completed 4 more cycles; PET+ escalated to 4 cycles BEACOPP2-y EFS: 50%2-y EFS: 82%
Radford, 2015 (25)602 limited-HL patientsPET-3 (ABVD); PET− underwent radiotherapy or no therapy; PET+ completed 1 more cycle or radiotherapyPFS: 87.6%PFS: 92.3% (radiotherapy), 88.6% (no radiotherapy)
Straus, 2015 (52)164 limited-HL patientsPET-2 (ABVD); PET− completed 2 more cycles; PET+ escalated to 2 cycles BEACOPP, radiotherapy3-y PFS: 66%3-y PFS: 92%
Press, 2016 (24)358 advanced-HL patientsPET-2 (ABVD); PET− completed 2 more cycles; PET+ escalated to 6 cycles BEACOPP2-y PFS: 64%2-y PFS: 82%
Zinzani, 2016 (53)519 advanced-HL patientsPET-2 (ABVD); PET− completed 4 more cycles; PET+ escalated to salvage therapy, ASCT2-y PFS: 76%2-y PFS: 81%
  • FFS = failure-free survival; NA = not applicable; EFS = event-free survival.