TABLE 3

Studies Investigating Predictive Ability of Interim PET Imaging in NHL

Results
StudyPatient populationCycles completed before imagingPET+PET−
Lin, 2007 (54)92 DLBCL patients (11 limited, 81 advanced)2 (CHOP, R-CHOP, ACVBP, R-ACVBP)2-y EFS: 51%2-y EFS: 79%
Casasnovas, 2011 (55)102 NHL patients2–4 (R-ACVBP, R-CHOP)2-y PFS: 73% (IHP), 79% (D5PS)2-y PFS: 77% (IHP), 88% (D5PS)
Cashen, 2011 (56)50 advanced-DLBCL patients2 (R-CHOP)2-y EFS: 63%2-y EFS: 85%
Yang, 2011 (57)161 DLBCL patients (94 limited, 67 advanced)3–4 (R-CHOP)3-y PFS: 52.5%3-y PFS: 88.3%
Yoo, 2011 (28)155 DLBCL patients (68 limited, 87 advanced)2–4 (R-CHOP)3-y PFS: 66%*3-y PFS: 84%*
Dupuis, 2012 (33)121 follicular lymphoma patients4 (R-CHOP)2-y PFS: 61%2-y PFS: 86%
Pregno, 2012 (29)88 DLBCL patients (29 limited, 59 advanced)2–4 (R-CHOP)2-y PFS: 72%*2-y PFS: 85%*
Safar, 2012 (58)112 DLBCL patients (21 limited, 91 advanced)2 (R-CHOP, R-ACVBP)3-y PFS: 47%3-y PFS: 84%
Itti, 2013 (59)114 DLBCL patients2 (rituximab)3-y PFS: 59%3-y PFS: 81%
Carr, 2014 (60)61 DLBCL patients (24 limited, 37 advanced)2–3 (R-CHOP)2-y EFS: 58%; 2-y OS: 72%2-y EFS: 90%; 2-y OS: 93%
Khong, 2014 (31)24 natural killer/T-cell lymphoma patients2 −3 (SMILE)2-y PFS: 17%; 2-y OS: 17%2-y PFS: 62%; 2-y OS: 81%
Nols, 2014 (61)73 DLBCL patients (23 limited, 50 advanced)3–4 (R-CHOP, ACVBP)PFS: 47% (D5PS)PFS: 84% (D5PS)
Huang, 2015 (30)32 DLBCL patients (9 limited, 23 advanced)2 (R-CHOP)2-y PFS: 82%*2-y PFS: 88%*
Fukumoto, 2015 (32)79 natural killer/T-cell lymphoma patients2–45-y PFS: 9.2%5-y PFS: 66%
Mamot, 2015 (8)138 DLBCL patients (64 limited, 74 advanced)2 (R-CHOP)2-y EFS: 48%; 2-y OS: 88%*2-y EFS: 74%; 2-y OS: 91%*
  • * Nonsignificant.

  • ACVBP = adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone; R-ACVBP = rituximab, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone; EFS = event-free survival; IHP = International Harmonization Project criteria; SMILE = dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, l-asparaginase, and etoposide; OS = overall survival.