TABLE 3

Agreement Levels Between OSEMPET1/OSEMPET2 Scenario and Other Scenarios Involving Reconstruction Inconsistency

κ (95% confidence interval)
ScenarioOverall (n = 86)NSCLC (n = 51)Colorectal liver metastases (n = 24)Melanoma metastases (n = 11)
OSEMPET1/OSEMPET2 vs. OSEMPET1/PSF ± TOF.EQPET20.95 (0.90–1.00)0.94 (0.87–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)0.85 (0.59–1.00)
OSEMPET1/OSEMPET2 vs. PSF ± TOF.EQPET1/OSEMPET21.00 (1.00–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)
OSEMPET1/OSEMPET2 vs. OSEMPET1/PSF ± TOFPET20.72 (0.60–0.84)0.74 (0.60–0.90)0.71 (0.48–0.94)0.58 (0.18–0.99)
OSEMPET1/OSEMPET2 vs. PSF ± TOFPET1/OSEMPET20.79 (0.69–0.90)0.75 (0.60–0.90)0.76 (0.55–0.97)1.00 (1.00–1.00)
OSEMPET1/OSEMPET2 vs. PSF ± TOF.EQPET1/PSF ± TOF.EQPET20.93 (0.87–1.00)0.91 (0.83–1.00)1.00 (1.00–1.00)0.86 (0.59–1.00)
OSEMPET1/OSEMPET2 vs. PSF ± TOFPET1/PSF ± TOFPET20.92 (0.85–0.99)0.92 (0.83–1.00)0.94 (1.83–1.00)0.86 (0.59–1.00)
  • NSCLC = non–small cell lung cancer.

  • Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.