TABLE 2

Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model for OS

ParameterCoefficientHazard ratioP
Sex (male vs. female)−0.05 (−0.39 to 0.28)0.95 (0.68–1.32)0.75
Age (y)0.01 (−0.01 to 0.03)1.01 (0.99–1.03)0.19
Performance status (1 vs. 0)1.13 (0.53 to 1.73)*<0.001
Performance status × time (mo)−0.04 (−0.07 to −0.01) *0.005
Clinical stage (IIIB vs. IIIA/IIB)0.34 (0.01 to 0.66) 1.40 (1.01–1.94)0.04
Log MTV (centered)0.18 (0.05 to 0.31)1.20 (1.05–1.36)0.007
100 × SumMean (centered)−0.44 (−1.06 to 0.18) 0.64 (0.35–1.20)0.16
Log MTV (centered) × 100 × SumMean (centered)−0.57 (−1.05 to −0.08)0.02
  • * Single hazard ratio is not reported as the specified covariate is time-varying, thus implying that the hazard ratio varies over time.

  • Log MTV (centered) corresponds to Log MTV − mean of Log MTV. Because both covariates involved in statistical interaction are centered, hazard ratio for Log MTV can be interpreted at mean value of 100 × SumMean. Hazard ratio corresponds to 1-unit increase in MTV on natural log scale.

  • 100 × SumMean (centered) is 100 × SumMean − mean of 100 × SumMean. Because both covariates involved in statistical interaction are centered, hazard ratio for SumMean can be interpreted at mean value of Log MTV. Hazard ratio corresponds to 0.01 increase in SumMean.

  • Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.