No. of patients | Study aim(s) | Results | Reference |
47 | Quantify tumor 18F-FES uptake as predictor of endocrine therapy response | Absence of uptake predicted failure of endocrine therapy | 38 |
19 | Investigate utility of 18F-FES PET for predicting overall response to first-line endocrine therapy in MBC | Low or absent 18F-FES uptake correlated with lack of ER expression | 39 |
11 | Assess serial 18F-FES PET and 18F-FDG PET for predicting response to tamoxifen | Increase in 18F-FDG uptake and decrease in 18F-FES uptake after start of tamoxifen predicted response | 40 |
30 | Measure changes in 18F-FES uptake with aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, or fulvestrant | No effect with aromatase inhibitors; ∼55% decrease with tamoxifen or fulvestrant | 41 |
40 | Assess serial 18F-FES PET and 18F-FDG PET for predicting response to tamoxifen | Increase in 18F-FDG uptake and decrease in 18F-FES uptake after start of tamoxifen predicted response | 42 |
16 | Evaluate whether 500 mg of fulvestrant optimally abolishes ER availability in tumor | 18F-FES PET showed residual ER availability during fulvestrant therapy in 38% of patients; this finding was associated with early progression | 43 |
59 | Investigate whether 18F-FES PET and serial 18F-FDG PET predict response to endocrine therapy | Baseline 18F-FES uptake and metabolic flare after estradiol challenge predicted treatment response | 68 |
17 | Assess correlation between 18F-FES uptake and IHC | Good correlation for ER was observed | 69 |
53 | Compare 18F-FES PET with 18F-FDG PET and IHC | 18F-FES PET showed 88% agreement with IHC and provided information not obtained with 18F-FDG PET | 70 |
91 | Measure variability in 18F-FES uptake between and within patients | Substantial variations in 18F-FES uptake between and within patients were observed | 71 |
13 | Assess feasibility of 18F-FES PET for detecting primary ER-positive breast cancer lesions and correlation with in vitro status | Focal uptake of 18F-FES was seen in all tumors; uptake correlated well with in vitro assays | 72 |
239 | Assess correlation between 18F-FES PET and clinical and laboratory data, effects of previous treatments, and 18F-FES metabolism | 18F-FES uptake correlated positively with BMI and inversely with plasma sex hormone–binding globulin levels and binding capacity | 73 |
18 | Assess clinical value of dual PET/CT tracers 18F-FES and 18F-FDG in predicting response to NAC | 18F-FES PET/CT may be feasible for predicting response to NAC | 74 |
32 | Investigate heterogeneity of ER expression among tumor sites with 18F-FES PET | 18F-FES uptake and 18F-FDG uptake varied greatly within and among patients; 18F-FES PET/CT showed heterogeneous ER expression | 75 |
48 | Correlate 18F-FES PET with ER expression in patients with primary, operable breast cancer | 18F-FES PET SUV correlated with IHC ER expression; size of primary tumor was associated with 18F-FES PET SUV | 76 |
33 | Evaluate clinical value of 18F-FES PET/CT in assisting with individualized treatment decisions for ER-positive breast cancer patients | Treatment plan was changed in 48.5% of cases on basis of 18F-FES PET/CT results | 53 |
ICH = immunohistochemistry; BMI=body mass index; NAC = neoadjuvant chemotherapy.