TABLE 2

Change in Management Associated with NaF PET Categorized as Treatment Versus Nontreatment and Stratified by Indication

Treatment plan
Before PETAfter PETInitial staging (n = 1,024)Suspected FOM (n = 1,997)Suspected POM (n = 510)
 NontreatmentNontreatment183 (17.9)777 (38.9)122 (23.9)
 TreatmentTreatment363 (35.4)339 (17.0)123 (24.1)
 NontreatmentTreatment424 (41.4)703 (35.2)239 (46.9)
 TreatmentNontreatment54 (5.3)178 (8.9)26 (5.1)
Rate of change in management46.7% (95% CI, 43.6–49.7)44.1 (95% CI, 41.9–46.3)52.0 (95% CI, 47.6–56.3)
Imaging-adjusted rate*12.2% (95% CI, 10.2–14.2)15.8 (95% CI, 14.2–17.4)12.4 (95% CI, 9.5–15.2)
  • * Adjusted to assume no effect of NaF PET for cases with pre-PET plan of imaging.

  • Difference between pre- and post-PET plans (rows) is compared with indication for scan (columns). Data in parentheses are percentages.

  • CI = confidence interval.