TABLE 5

Contribution of PET/CT and Pathologic Responses to PFS and OS Prediction

ModelCovariatePFSOS
R2P*HR (95% confidence interval)R2P*HR (95% confidence interval)
BottomPathologic response0.1100.45 (0.19–1.04)0.1230.31 (0.10–1.02)
10.2220.0410.3630.002
Pathologic response0.48 (0.20–1.14)0.38(0.11–1.25)
Highest SUVmax0.42(0.18–0.98)0.09(0.01–0.68)
20.2510.0210.1720.180
Pathologic response0.37(0.15–0.89)0.32(0.10–1.03)
Highest TLG0.32(0.13–0.80)0.47(0.16–1.39)
30.2220.0410.3630.002
Pathologic response0.48(0.20–1.14)0.38(0.11–1.25)
Total SUVmax0.42(0.18–0.98)0.09(0.01–0.68)
40.2230.0400.2460.030
Pathologic response0.37(0.15–0.88)0.25(0.08–0.85)
Total TLG0.35(0.14–0.90)0.27(0.08–0.85)
50.1350.3440.2430.032
Pathologic response0.47(0.20–1.08)0.33(0.10–1.10)
SUVmax by lesion0.66(0.27–1.60)0.17(0.02–1.33)
60.2620.0160.1930.107
Pathologic response0.40(0.17–0.95)0.33(0.10–1.07)
TLG by lesion0.36(0.16–0.81)0.40(0.13–1.24)
  • * From likelihood ratio test that compares each model with 2 covariates (PET indicator plus pathologic response) with bottom model (with pathologic response alone).