TABLE 3

Multivariate Analyses of Clinicopathologic and Imaging Variables on PFS

Model A*Model B*
VariableHazard ratioPHazard ratioP
Lymphovascular invasion, no vs. yes2.87 (0.49–16.69)0.2392.23 (0.38–12.92)0.372
Perineural invasion, no vs. yes1.01 (0.171–5.50)0.9701.20 (0.21–6.97)0.839
pT1–2 vs. pT3–41.10 (0.24–2.55)0.5511.69 (0.36–4.60)0.872
pN0 vs. pN1–21.27 (0.38–4.46)0.8761.10 (0.25–4.61)0.922
Overall pTNM stage I–II vs. III–IV1.91 (0.38–9.51)0.4311.87 (0.67–10.10)0.186
MTV ≤ 17.7 vs. > 17.7 mL11.50 (1.45–91.01)0.011
TLG ≤ 56.3 vs. > 56.3 g3.55 (1.07–11.76)0.038
  • * Because of multicolinearity (r = 0.902) between MTV and TGA, TLG and MTV were not included in models A and B, respectively.

  • Multivariate analysis using Cox-proportional hazards model. Variables with P < 0.05 in univariate analyses were selected for multivariate analysis.

  • Data in parentheses are 95% CIs.