TABLE 5

Results of Interregional Correlation Analysis of ROI Compensation in LE and HE Prodromal AD Patients

Peak level
Cluster levelTalairach coordinates
AnalysisCluster extentCorrected PCortical regionMaximum z scorexyzCortical regionBA
LE1,2860.026R frontal4.312228−18Middle frontal gyrus11
R frontal4.233030−15Inferior frontal gyrus47
R frontal4.121817−11Subcallosal gyrus47
R frontal4.152286Inferior frontal gyrus45
R frontal3.97424916Middle frontal gyrus46
R frontal3.954829−2Inferior frontal gyrus45
R frontal3.946414Inferior frontal gyrus46
R frontal3.873831−12Inferior frontal gyrus47
R limbic3.81834−12Anterior cingulate32
HE11,3030.0001L frontal17.2−50313Precentral gyrus44
L occipital16−16−682Lingual gyrus18
R frontal15.930−1347Middle frontal gyrus6
R frontal15.636−837Precentral gyrus6
R frontal14.3221649Superior frontal gyrus8
L limbic8.84−18−47−4Parahippocampal gyrus19
L temporal8.22−408−31Superior temporal gyrus38
L temporal5.61−61−37−8Middle temporal gyrus21
L temporal5.39−63−24−21Inferior temporal gyrus20
L parietal5.12−20−4652Precuneus7
L parietal4.96−18−4736Precuneus31
R temporal4.9055−21−23Fusiform gyrus20
R temporal4.8059−11−18Inferior temporal gyrus21
R frontal4.78105421Superior frontal gyrus9
R frontal4.4223337Middle frontal gyrus8
L sublobar3.96−3010−2Claustrum
R temporal3.784817−13Superior temporal gyrus38
2,0000.003L cerebellum14.6−36−54−36Cerebellar tonsil
  • P values of <0.001 (uncorrected at voxel level) and <0.05 (FDR-corrected for multiple comparisons at cluster level) were accepted as statistically significant. In cluster level section, reported for each statistically significant cluster are number of voxels, corrected P value, and cortical region where cluster was found. In peak level section, reported for each significant cluster are z score, peak coordinates, corresponding cortical region, and BA.