Average Absorbed Dose Comparison for Case 3
Average absorbed dose (Gy) and RD (%) | ||||||||||
VD | VDd | ![]() | ||||||||
Structure of interest | TIA (MBq.s) | Mass (g, with d(x,y,z)) | Mass (g, with d = 1.04) | 3D-RD | Gy | % | Gy | % | Gy | % |
Tumoral liver | 196 | 749 | 743 | 38.2 | 38.8 | 1.7 | 38.5 | 0.8 | 38.5 | 0.8 |
Nontumoral liver | 86.1 | 1,970 | 1,954 | 6.55 | 6.7 | 1.6 | 6.60 | 0.8 | 6.60 | 0.8 |
Stomach wall | 1.29 | 226 | 230 | 0.86 | 0.85 | –1.5 | 0.86 | –0.1 | 0.86 | 0.1 |