TABLE 2

Diagnostic Accuracy of PET/CT for Overall Evaluation of Distant Malignancies in Cancer Patients

StudyNo. of studies (no. of patients)Sensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PLR (95% CI)NLR (95% CI)
All41 (4,305)0.93 (0.88–0.96)0.96 (0.95–0.96)20.8 (16.8–25.8)0.08 (0.05–0.13)
Type of eligible patients
 Primary cancer23 (2,607)0.91 (0.83–0.95)0.95 (0.94–0.96)18.7 (14.9–23.5)0.10 (0.06–0.18)
 Recurrent cancer16 (1,215)0.91 (0.80–0.96)0.96 (0.94–0.97)22.9 (15.3–34.3)0.09 (0.04–0.22)
Prevalence
 Low prevalence (<15%)17 (1,825)0.93 (0.85–0.97)0.96 (0.94–0.97)22.0 (16.4–29.7)0.07 (0.03–0.16)
 High prevalence (≥15%)24 (2,480)0.92 (0.84–0.96)0.95 (0.94–0.97)19.7 (14.5–26.9)0.09 (0.04–0.17)
QUADAS*
 <1218 (1,671)0.95 (0.90–0.98)0.96 (0.95–0.97)25.3 (17.3–37.1)0.05 (0.02–0.11)
 ≥1223 (2,634)0.89 (0.81–0.94)0.95 (0.94–0.96)18.1 (14.0–23.3)0.11 (0.06–0.21)
Analysis method
 Qualitative19 (2,144)0.90 (0.81–0.95)0.95 (0.94–0.96)18.6 (14.8–23.3)0.11 (0.05–0.21)
 Both qualitative and quantitative17 (1,671)0.93 (0.85–0.97)0.95 (0.93–0.97)19.7 (13.7–28.4)0.07 (0.03–0.17)
Design
 Prospective22 (2,071)0.88 (0.79–0.94)0.96 (0.95–0.97)20.7 (16.1–26.7)0.12 (0.07–0.23)
 Retrospective19 (2,234)0.96 (0.90–0.98)0.95 (0.94–0.97)20.6 (14.5–29.2)0.04 (0.02–0.11)
  • * Number of items assessed as “yes” in QUADAS tool.