TABLE 2

Recent Physical Phantom Evaluations of SPECT Quantification of Radionuclides Relevant to Internal Radionuclide Therapy as Well as 99mTc

StudyRadionuclideSystemReconstructionAbsolute quantification accuracy
Zeintl et al., 2010 (18)99mTcSPECT/CTOS-EM, CDR, CT-derived AC, energy window–based SC, PVC<6.8% error for 0.5- to 16-mL spheres
Dewaraja et al., 2010 (37)131ISPECT/CTOS-EM, CDR, CT-derived AC, energy window–based SC<17% error for 8- to 95-mL spheres; 31% for 4-mL sphere
Assie et al., 2010 (23)111InSPECT and CT separateOS-EM, CT-derived AC, energy window–based SC, PVC<20% error for organs and 2- to 32-mL spheres; 48% error for 0.5-mL sphere
Shcherbinin et al., 2008 (49)99mTc, 111In, 123I, 131ISPECT/CTOS-EM, CDR, CT-derived AC, analytic scatter modeling3%–5% error for 32-mL bottles
Minarik et al., 2008 (95)90YSPECT/CTOS-EM, CDR, CT-derived AC, ESSE<11% error for liver and 100-mL sphere
Willowson et al., 2008 (19)99mTcSPECT/CTOS-EM, CT-derived AC, transmission-dependent SC, PVC<4% error for liver and cardiac chambers
de Wit et al., 2006 (59)166HoSPECTOS-EM, CDR, 153Gd transmission source–derived AC, Monte Carlo scatter modeling16% average error for 220-mL bottles
Du et al., 2006 (62)123ISPECT/CTOS-EM, CDR, CT-derived AC, ESSE, PVC<2% error for putamen and caudate regions of brain phantom
He at al, 2005 (52)111InSPECT/CTOS-EM, CDR, CT-derived AC, ESSE, PVC<12% error for organs and 8- to 23-mL spheres
Koral et al., 2005 (50)131ISPECT and CT separateOS-EM, CDR, CT-derived AC, energy window–based SC, PVC<7% average error for 100-mL sphere
  • AC = attenuation correction; SC = scatter correction.