Study 1 | Study 2 | ||||||||||
Patient | Age (y) | Sex | Primary tumor | Interval between injections (h) | Dose (MBq) | SNs (n) | Basins (n) | Dose (MBq) | SNs (n) | Basins (n) | R2 |
1 | 33 | M | Melanoma trunk | 24 | 71 | 2 | 1 | 80 | 2 | 1 | * |
2 | 66 | M | Melanoma trunk | 21 | 88 | 3 | 2 | 77 | 3 | 2 | 0.91 |
3 | 26 | F | Melanoma trunk | 24 | 74 | 2 | 2 | 79 | 2 | 1 | * |
4 | 65 | M | Melanoma trunk | 20 | 78 | 2 | 1 | 80 | 2 | 2 | * |
5 | 50 | F | Melanoma trunk | 5 | 71 | 2 | 2 | 68 | 2 | 2 | * |
6 | 30 | F | Melanoma trunk | 4 | 68 | 3 | 3 | 73 | 3 | 3 | 0.99 |
7 | 74 | M | Head/neck melanoma | 23 | 61 | 3 | 3 | 70 | 3 | 3 | 0.99 |
8 | 55 | M | Head/neck melanoma | 3 | 59 | 2 | 2 | 76 | 2 | 2 | * |
9 | 32 | F | Head/neck melanoma | 2.5 | 54 | 1 | 1 | 67 | 1 | 1 | * |
10 | 39 | M | Head/neck melanoma | 4.5 | 87 | 2 | 2 | 86 | 2 | 2 | * |
11 | 70 | F | Head/neck melanoma | 22 | 64 | 3 | 3 | 67 | 3 | 3 | 0.93 |
12 | 32 | F | Head/neck melanoma | 2.5 | 64 | 3 | 2 | 72 | 3 | 2 | 0.85 |
13 | 49 | M | Head/neck melanoma | 23 | 67 | 1 | 1 | 60 | 1 | 1 | * |
14 | 66 | F | Head/neck melanoma | 20 | 61 | 2 | 2 | 58 | 2 | 2 | * |
15 | 56 | F | Head/neck melanoma | 2.5 | 82 | 6 | 6 | 98 | 6 | 6 | 0.58 |
16 | 67 | F | Head/neck melanoma | 22 | 74 | 2 | 2 | 96 | 2 | 2 | * |
17 | 57 | M | Penile carcinoma | 2.5 | 80 | 2 | 2 | 87 | 2 | 2 | * |
18 | 61 | M | Penile carcinoma | 2.5 | 69 | 5 | 2 | 57 | 5 | 2 | 0.96 |
19 | 72 | M | Penile carcinoma | 19 | 70 | 3 | 2 | 73 | 3 | 2 | 0.93 |
20 | 72 | M | Penile carcinoma | 24 | 61 | 3 | 2 | 83 | 3 | 2 | 0.71 |
21 | 48 | M | Penile carcinoma | 20 | 70 | 3 | 1 | 59 | 3 | 1 | 0.51 |
22 | 34 | M | Penile carcinoma | 20 | 69 | 3 | 2 | 71 | 3 | 2 | 0.99 |
23 | 64 | M | Penile carcinoma | 23 | 67 | 3 | 1 | 66 | 3 | 1 | 0.99 |
24 | 71 | M | Penile carcinoma | 20 | 75 | 3 | 2 | 81 | 3 | 2 | 0.49 |
25 | 65 | M | Penile carcinoma | 2.5 | 83 | 2 | 2 | 74 | 2 | 2 | * |
↵* Correlation between counting rates measured 2 h after each injection (could be calculated only in patients with > 2 SNs).
Study 1 = first examination, using 99mTc-nanocolloid; study 2 = second examination, using ICG–99mTc-nanocolloid; SN = sentinel node; R2 = correlation of sentinel node counting rates in both studies.