TABLE 3

Impact of PET on Intended Management for Restaging in Patients Older Than 65 Years

CancerTime periodPatients (n)Nontreatment to treatment (%)Treatment to nontreatment (%)Change in management (%)95% confidence intervalImaging-adjusted impact (%)*95% confidence interval
Bladder20063,32228.27.936.134.5–37.816.014.8–17.3
20095,53929.45.935.334.0–36.612.811.9–13.7
Kidney20063,06824.87.332.130.5–33.814.413.2–15.7
20094,70827.25.833.031.6–34.412.711.7–13.6
Pancreas20062,87631.68.640.238.4–42.016.515.1–17.9
20094,23834.25.840.038.6–41.512.911.9–13.9
Prostate20064,85627.710.237.836.5–39.216.015.0–17.0
20095,46534.47.041.440.0–42.713.412.5–14.3
Small cell lung20062,81033.07.840.738.9–42.615.213.9–16.5
20095,40334.45.840.238.9–41.512.711.8–13.6
Stomach20062,28123.18.131.229.3–33.112.911.5–14.3
20093,16226.06.432.430.8–34.011.910.8–13.0
Uterus20063,36726.47.533.832.2–35.514.813.6–16.0
20094,85029.25.534.733.3–36.012.511.6–13.5
All other cancers20065,28027.27.034.333.0–35.614.613.7–15.6
200915,46627.65.833.432.7–34.212.411.9–12.9
Total200627,86027.78.135.835.3–36.415.114.7–15.6
200948,83129.96.035.935.4–36.312.612.3–12.9
  • * Imaging-adjusted impact: No benefit from PET was assumed for cases with a plan before PET of alternative imaging.