TABLE 2

Paired Correlation and Paired-Samples Test Between LBM Obtained from Whole-Body CT Data (LBM_CT) and LBM Obtained from Proposed Method (LBMb5, LBMv5, LBMb20, LBMv20) and Predictive Equations (LBMp1 to LBMp5)

Paired-samples correlations			Paired-samples test
Pair	Correlation coefficient	Significance	Pair	Mean (kg)	SEM (kg)	Significance (2-tailed)
LBM_CT and LBMb5	0.991	<0.001	LBM_CT–LBMb5	0.17	0.33	0.615
LBM_CT and LBMv5	0.992	<0.001	LBM_CT–LBMv5	0.13	0.31	0.686
LBM_CT and LBMb20	0.998	<0.001	LBM_CT–LBMb20	0.06	0.15	0.723
LBM_CT and LBMv20	0.998	<0.001	LBM_CT–LBMv20	0.03	0.14	0.831
LBM_CT and LBMp1	0.635	.005	LBM_CT–LBMp1	1.49	2.40	0.544
LBM_CT and LBMp2	0.959	<0.001	LBM_CT–LBMp2	−12.72	1.08	<0.001
LBM_CT and LBMp3	0.954	<0.001	LBM_CT–LBMp3	−4.35	0.80	<0.001
LBM_CT and LBMp4	0.970	<0.001	LBM_CT–LBMp4	0.20	0.64	0.759
LBM_CT and LBMp5	0.967	<0.001	LBM_CT–LBMp5	−2.31	0.650	.002