Comparison of Dmean to NTL Calculated by Partition Model Approach and VoxelDose
| Dmean to NTL | ||||||
| Patient no. | NTL mass (g) | Partition model (Gy) | VoxelDose (Gy) | VoxelDose SD (Gy) | Percentage of relative difference | Absorbed dose range in NTL (Gy) |
| 1 | 1,605 | 2.94 × 101 | 2.94 × 101 | 2.49 × 101 | 0.02 | 0–1.90 × 102 |
| 2 | 1,151 | 4.38 × 101 | 4.53 × 101 | 3.10 × 101 | 3.46 | 0–2.42 × 102 |
| 3 | 1,444 | 2.78 × 101 | 2.90 × 101 | 5.63 × 101 | 4.27 | 0–4.27 × 102 |
| 4 | 2,371 | 4.61 × 101 | 4.85 × 101 | 4.81 × 101 | 5.16 | 0–4.03 × 102 |
| 5 | 1,115 | 5.55 × 101 | 5.72 × 101 | 6.22 × 101 | 3.04 | 0–5.19 × 102 |
| 6 | 1,532 | 1.25 × 101 | 1.37 × 101 | 2.7 × 101 | 8.90 | 0–2.72 × 102 |
| 7 | 1,211 | 1.38 × 102 | 1.44 × 102 | 1.37 × 102 | 4.16 | 0–2.26 × 103 |
| 8 | 1,199 | 4.85 × 101 | 5.11 × 101 | 7.19 × 101 | 5.52 | 0–6.91 × 102 |
| 9 | 1,121 | 5.47 × 101 | 5.69 × 101 | 6.46 × 101 | 4.11 | 0–4.91 × 102 |
| 10 | 1,626 | 2.50 × 101 | 2.63 × 101 | 4.47 × 101 | 5.18 | 0–7.75 × 102 |
| Mean ± SD | 1,503 ± 572 | 4.81 × 101 ± 3.45 × 101 | 5.01 × 101 ± 3.60 × 101 | 4.38 ± 2.23 | ||