TABLE 2

Risk of Completion ALND and Risk of Missed Axillary Disease After Negative Sentinel Node in Different Clinical Settings

TrialCategoryPatients SNB + ALNDSentinel node not identifiedPositive SNB casesCompletion ALND required*SNB false-negative rateEstimates of residual disease after negative sentinel node
ALMANAC validation study (20)T1 (≤2 cm)4583.5% (16)27.9% (128)31.4% (144)5.2% (7/135)2.2% (7/314)
T2 (2.1–5 cm)2353.4% (8)51.1% (120)54.5% (128)7.7% (10/130)9.3% (10/107)
NSABP B32 (21)T12,2013% (65)21.4% (472)24.4% (537)10.3% (54/526)3.2% (54/1,664)
2.1–4 cm4901.6% (8)39.6% (194)41.2% (202)8.9% (19/213)6.6% (19/288)
ALMANAC validation study (20)Multifocal lesions755.3% (4)41.3% (31/75)46.7% (35/75)8.8% (3/34)7.5% (3/40)
IGASSU (37)Multicentric or multifocal2116.6% (14)42.2% (89)48.8%13.6% (14/103)12.9% (14/108)
Neoadjuvant (40)Neoadjuvant chemotherapy1959.7% (19)23.6% (46)33.3% (65)11.5% (6/52)4.6% (6/130)
  • * Completion ALND is theoretically required when sentinel node is positive or not identified. Numbers are extracted from Tables 1 and 4 of ALMANAC (20). Data are based on patients with available information on tumor size. Only 12 patients had T3 tumor, not allowing comparison.

  • Numbers are extracted from Tables 1, 2, and 4 of NSABP B-32 (21). Rate of failed sentinel node identification is an approximation based on data from both arms combined.

  • Injection was subareolar; 62% had dual mapping, and 37% had only radioisotope.

  • Data were extracted from ALMANAC validation phase (20), NSABP B-32 trial (group SNB + ALND) (21), IGASSU trial (Interest of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Multiple Invasive Breast Cancer) (37), and “Ganglion Sentinelle et Chimiothérapie Néoadjuvante” trial (40).