TABLE 1

SNB False-Negative Rates: Results of Large Multiinstitutional Trials

TrialExclusion criteriaSentinel node identifiedEvaluable patients (SNB + ALND)Node-positive patientsFalse-negative rateTracers and injection sitesProcedure
SNAC (19)Tumor > 3 cm, or multifocal93.5%539145 (29%)5.5% (8/145)99mTc-antimony sulfide colloid peritumoral; +patent blue V peritumoralScintigraphy and γ-probe + blue dye
ALMANAC validation study (20)96.1%803282 (35.1%)6.7% (19/282)99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin peritumoral; +patent blue V peritumoralScintigraphy and γ-probe + blue dye
NSABP-B32 (21)97.2%2,619766 (29.2%)9.8% (75/766)Unfiltered 99mTc-sulfur colloid peritumoral (+1 intradermal); +isosulfan blue peritumoralγ-probe + blue dye
Sentinella/GIVOM (16)>3 cm, multifocal, or unpalpable95%323108 (33.4%)16.7% (18/108)99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin subdermally; no blue dyeScintigraphy and γ-probe
Total∼96%4,2841,301 (30.4%)9.2% (120/1,301)
  • SNAC = sentinel node biopsy versus axillary clearance.

  • A single-center study (71) that was interrupted prematurely, with only 115 evaluated patients, was not included in these data.