TABLE 2

Summary of 18F-FDG PET Studies Conducted for Monitoring Responses to Cytostatic Therapies

AgentAuthorYearNo. of patientsPhase of trialsTime after treatment when scanning was doneChange in SUVmax in partial responders*Criteria for PET responseOutcome measureDesignP
ImatinibBanzo (33)200818NSpVariableNAEORTCResponseProspectiveNS
Holdsworth (34)200763NSp1 mo40%NSNS
Choi (35)200740NSp2 mo75%>70% decreaseResponseProspective
Simo Perdigo (36)200620NSp8–12 wk33%−67%NSResponseProspective
Heinicke (37)20055NSp1 wk60%NSResponseNSpNS
Goerres (38)200534NSpVariable55%EORTC78% survival (95% CI = 63%−94%)ProspectiveNS
Goldstein (39)200518NSpNANAEORTCProspectiveNS
Jager (40)200416NSp1 wk65%NSSurvival0.002
Gayed (41)200449NSpVariable51%EORTCResponseNSp
Choi (42)200436NSp2 mo64.9%Modified EORTCResponseProspective<0.0001
Antoch (43)200420NSp1, 3, and 6 moNAEORTCResponseProspective0.04
Van Oosterom (7)200140I1 and 4 wkNAEORTCResponseProspective
BevacizumabGoshen (44)20067INANANSResponse and pathologyRetrospectiveNS
EndostatinHerbst (45)200225I28 and 56 d5%−69%VariableResponseProspectiveNS
GefitinibSunaga (46)20085IDay 2 and 4 wk61% on day 2NSPFS of >12 moProspectiveNS
LapatinibKawada (47)20078I1, 2, and 3 mo6%−42%NSResponseProspectiveNS
CetuximabDe Fabio (48)200722IIAt 6-wk intervals>35%<35%ResponseProspectiveNS
Tamoxifen or fulvestrantDehdashti (49)200851IIAfter 30 mg of estradiol>12% increase, by ROC analysis20%ResponseProspectiveNS
Mortimer (50)200140II7–10 dNA28.4% increaseResponseProspectiveNS
GoserelinOyama (51)200110I1–5 moNA66.4%ResponseNSp0.04
  • * Decrease, unless otherwise indicated.

  • Responses were correctly predicted in 85% of patients (3 mo) and 100% of patients (3 and 6 mo).

  • NSp = not specified; NS = not significant; NA = data not available; CI = confidence interval; PFS = progression-free survival; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.