TABLE 3

Summary of Previous Studies

P1P2
Referencen*GR/PRPMeanMedianRangeMeanMedianRangeCutoffPPVNPV
Schulte et al. (7)2717/10TBR10.33.3–33.22.920.32–20.33P2/P1 ≤ 0.6 for GR (n = 19)89.5%100%
Franzius et al. (13)119/2TBR4.42.3–13.61.70.9–11.9P2/P1 < 0.7 for GR (n = 9)100%100%
Ye et al. (16)158/7TBR7.13.0–20.63.11.1–6.5P2/P1 < 0.46 for GR (n = 8)100%100%
Hawkins et at. (14)185/13SUVmax8.22.5–24.13.31.6–12.8P2 < 2 for GR (n = 4)75%85.7%
Huang et al. (15)102/8SUVmax8.21.4–13.64.41.7–9.6P2/P1 < 0.4 for GR (n = 2)100%100%
Present study7033/37SUVmax8.02.4–47.54.51.5–16.6Algorithm for GR (n = 32)97%95%
  • * Patients with high-grade osteosarcoma were included in this table.

  • n = number of patients who met cutoff criteria.

  • GR = good responder; PR = poor responder; P = parameter; P1 = parameter before chemotherapy; P2 = parameter after chemotherapy; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value; TBR = tumor-to-background ratio.