TABLE 2

Correlation Between PET/CT Findings of Distant Metastases and the Findings of Biopsy and Other Imaging Modalities in 20 Patients with IBC

PET/CT findings
ChestAbdomenContralateral LNs
Patient no.MusculoskeletalPulmonaryPleuralMediastinalLiverLNsAxillarySubpectoralInternal mammarySupraclavicularBiopsyCorrelative imaging
1*++Pos (supraclavicular)CT, FU
2+0MRI
3++0CT, WBS
4++++0FU
5+Pos (supraclavicular)US, FU
6++Pos (axillary)CT, FU
7− (FN)Pos (axillary)US, CT
8+0CT
9*+Pos (chest wall)US, CT
10*++++0CT, WBS, FU
11+0CT
12+− (FN)++0CT, WBS, FU
13− (FN)+++Pos (pleural)CT
14*+++++0CT, WBS
15+0MRI
16++++ (FP)Neg (axillary)CT, MRI
17+− (FN)+++0CT, WBS, FU
18++Pos (axillary)CT, US
19+0CT
20+0FU
  • * Patients who presented with clinical features suggestive of metastases.

  • Patients who did not have clinical suspicion or imaging evidence of metastases before PET/CT.

  • LNs = lymph nodes; + = positive on PET/CT; Pos = positive; FU = follow up with PET/CT; US = ultrasound; − = negative on PET/CT; FN = false-negative; FP = false-positive; Neg = negative.