TABLE 3

Statistical Results for CECT and NP-59 Imaging in Diagnosing Lesions and Predicting Postsurgical Improvement

ParameterSen (%)Spec (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)Acc (%)AUCP vs. NP-59 planarP vs. CECT
Pathologic result
 CECT81.822.272.033.364.50.52020.8969
 NP-59 planar40.966.775.031.648.40.5379
 NP-59 SPECT68.266.783.346.267.70.67420.15750.1841
 NP-59 SPECT/CT81.866.785.760.077.40.74240.03900.0429
Postsurgical improvement*
 CECT90.038.552.983.360.90.64230.3026
 NP-59 planar40.061.544.457.152.20.5077
 NP-59 SPECT90.053.860.087.569.60.71920.04980.5651
 NP-59 SPECT/CT10053.862.510073.90.76920.01410.2973
  • * For subset of 23 patients with unilateral adrenal lesions.

  • Sen = sensitivity; Spec = specificity; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value; Acc = accuracy.