TABLE 1

Patients and Reactive Neck Lymph Nodes

Patient no.Age (y)SexPrimary siteT stagePathologyInterval* (d)Previous therapyLevel of LNsDiameter of LNs (mm)SUVmax of LNsNo. of total folliclesNo. of secondary folliclesFollicular reactivity index (%)
158FR tongueT1SCC13L II12.5 × 7.52.1012037.531.3
263FL buccal mucosaT2SCC23Operation§R II11.5 × 5.52.918221.526.2
355MR tongueT1SCC17R II15 × 10.52.5892.53032.4
R III19 × 81.346734.5
478MPalateT1Adenoid cystic carcinoma28R II14 × 7.51.8314764.1
L II14 × 82.08115.51311.3
563MR tongueT1SCC28ChemotherapyR II12 × 93.7370.329.842.3
672FR buccal mucosaT1SCC21ChemotherapyR II10 × 82.0561.55.58.9
R III10 × 81.859544.2
764ML tongueT1SCC16L II16 × 102.171984623.2
868FR tongueT1SCC15R II15 × 81.9066913.6
959ML gingivaT1SCC30L II19 × 81.436646.1
1026MR tongueT2SCC23L I12 × 71.47982020.4
R II14 × 101.821281310.2
L II12 × 72.91572035.1
R III14 × 93.221154135.7
L III16 × 102.751625534.0
R V13.5 × 8.52.359025.528.3
1183FR gingivaT2SCC27R I10 × 72.28732128.8
R II18 × 112.151884926.1
  • * Days between PET/CT study and surgery.

  • Average values of 2 lymph nodes.

  • SUV was estimated on PET image of torso.

  • § Primary lesion and ipsilateral neck LNs had been resected 1 y and 8 mo before.

  • Chemotherapy by tegafur with gimeracil (TS-1; Taiho) had been taken orally for 1 mo before operation.

  • Average values of 4 lymph nodes.

  • Level I = submental and submandibular nodes; level II = upper deep cervical nodes; level III = middle deep cervical nodes; level IV = lower deep cervical nodes; level V = spinal accessory and transverse cervical nodes.

  • SCC = squamous cell carcinoma; LNs = lymph nodes.