Kinetic Modeling of Prostate
Parameter | 3C-5p | 3C-5p | 3C-4p | 3C-4p | 3C-3p | 3C-3p | 2C-3p | 2C-3p | Patlak-2p | Patlak-2p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Metabolite correction | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes |
n | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 |
k1 | 0.289 ± 0.130 | 0.318 ± 0.145 | 0.301 ± 0.131 | 0.319 ± 0.142 | 0.295 ± 0.134 | 0.316 ± 0.145 | 0.289 ± 0.132 | 0.231 ± 0.099 | ||
k2 | 0.190 ± 0.051 | 0.184 ± 0.108 | 0.206 ± 0.054 | 0.216 ± 0.091 | 0.190 ± 0.047 | 0.202 ± 0.100 | 0.177 ± 0.046 | 0.048 ± 0.013 | ||
k3 | 0.006 ± 0.010 | 0.126 ± 0.078 | 0.012 ± 0.018 | 0.141 ± 0.046 | 0.005 ± 0.008 | 0.124 ± 0.046 | ||||
k4 | 0.002 ± 0.002 | 0.008 ± 0.008 | 0.008 ± 0.017 | 0.006 ± 0.004 | ||||||
K | 0.006 ± 0.010 | 0.124 ± 0.062 | 0.012 ± 0.013 | 0.124 ± 0.049 | 0.006 ± 0.008 | 0.118 ± 0.049 | 0.005 ± 0.011 | 0.109 ± 0.056 | ||
Vb | 0.020 ± 0.020 | 0.024 ± 0.026 | 0.001 ± 0.003 | 0.000 ± 0.001 | ||||||
Vd | 1.52 ± 0.63 | 1.50 ± 1.28 | 1.44 ± 0.67 | 0.96 ± 0.46 | 1.53 ± 0.59 | 1.08 ± 1.03 | 1.62 ± 0.60 | 4.87 ± 1.80 | 1.51 ± 0.61 | 1.57 ± 1.50 |
WRSS | 397 ± 420 | 295 ± 278 | 439 ± 448 | 376 ± 368 | 491 ± 478 | 372 ± 386 | 491 ± 470 | 852 ± 722 | ||
NF | 0 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 4 | Reference M− | Reference M+ | ||
AIC | 71 ± 28 | 65 ± 26 | 72 ± 28 | 68 ± 28 | 74 ± 28 | 66 ± 28 | 75 ± 27 | 92 ± 24 |
2C, 3C = number of compartments; 2p, 3p, 4p, 5p = number of parameters in model. In model 3C-4p, Vb = 0 and in model 3C-3p both Vb and k4 are fixed to 0. NF = number of studies with a significantly lower error compared with corresponding 2C-3p (M− and M+—i.e., without and with metabolite correction as reference) determined with F test (P < 0.05). AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) is defined in Equation 3, and WRSS was used to calculate the likelihood function (35).
Estimates of fitted parameters k1–k4, as well as influx rate constant K, Vb, and Vd. Results are expressed as mean ± 1 SD of 22 studies (n) in 22 patients. Input function was corrected for partial-volume effects with 0.6 as recovery coefficient and for metabolites as indicated. Error estimate WRSS (Eq. 4) is a measure of “goodness of fit” between measured and calculated output function. Graphical analysis with Patlak plots was applied on images between 7 and 20 min.