Diagnostic Performance of Different Reading Strategies in 55 Patients
| Parameter (%) | FDG | FLT | LDCT | FDG + CT | FLT + CT | FDG + FLT | FLT + FDG + CT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 87.5 | 68.75 | 68.75 | 87.50 | 75.0 | 81.25 | 100 |
| Specificity | 58.97 | 76.92 | 74.36 | 69.23 | 87.18 | 87.18 | 89.74 |
| Accuracy | 67.27 | 74.45 | 72.73 | 74.55 | 83.64 | 85.45 | 92.73 |
| PPV | 46.67 | 55.0 | 52.38 | 53.85 | 70.59 | 72.22 | 80.0 |
| NPV | 92.0 | 85.71 | 85.29 | 93.1 | 89.47 | 91.89 | 100 |
LDCT = low-dose CT; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.