TABLE 2

Patient Characteristics for Studies Included in the Systematic Review

StudyNo. of patients*Histologic classPretherapy stageType of therapy
HD
 de Wit et al. (25)5NANAChemotherapy ± radiotherapy
 Filmont et al. (16)3222 NS, 7 MC, 2 LP, 1 LDNAChemotherapy ± radiotherapy ± surgery or autologous transplantation
 Foo et al. (26)97 NS, 1 MC, 1 unclassifiable8 II, 1 IIIChemotherapy ± radiotherapy
 Friedberg et al. (17)3220 NS, 6 MC, 3 LP, 7 unclassifiable3 I, 23 II, 6 III, 4 IVABVD or MOPP + ABVD ± radiotherapy
 Guay et al. (18)48NA2 I, 23 II, 15 III, 8 IVMOPP or ABVD ± radiotherapy
 Jerusalem et al. (27,31)3127 NS, 3 MC, 1 LDNAChemotherapy ± radiotherapy
 Keresztes et al. (32)26NANAC-MOPP + ABVD or C-MOPP + ABV + CEP ± radiotherapy
 Mikosch et al. (28)31NANAChemotherapy ± radiotherapy
 Mikhaeel et al. (29)15NA8 I + II, 7 III + IVABVD ± radiotherapy
 Mocikova et al. (33)71NANAChemotherapy ± radiotherapy
 Rigacci et al. (19)2822 NS, 5 MC, 1 LD21 II, 5 III, 2 IVABVD ± radiotherapy
 Schaefer et al. (30)1817 NS, 1 MCNANA
 Spaepen et al. (24)6045 NS, 9 MC, 3 LP, 3 unclassifiable25 II, 19 III, 16 IVStanford V or MOPP + ABV ± radiotherapy
 Weihrauch et al. (34)20NA1 I, 9 II, 7 III, 2 IVABVD, C-MOPP + ABVD, or BEACOPP ± radiotherapy
 Wickmann et al. (21)48NANAGPOH-HD 95§
Aggressive NHL
 de Wit et al. (25)6Aggressive by REAL/WHO criteriaNAChemotherapy ± radiotherapy
 Foo et al. (26)1211 diffuse large, 1 PTCL3 I, 5 II, 2 III, 2 IVChemotherapy ± radiotherapy
 Jerusalem et al. (31)3527 DLBCL, 8 FL grade 3NAChemotherapy ± radiotherapy
 Juweid et al. (22)5447 diffuse large cell, 4 ALCL, 2 diffuse mixed, 1 angioimmunoblastic T-cell19 I + II, 35 III + IV22 CHOP, 29 R-CHOP, 2 ProMACE-CytaBOM, 1 CNOP
 Mikosch et al. (28)24Aggressive by REAL/WHO criteriaNAChemotherapy ± radiotherapy
 Mikhaeel et al. (23)45“Aggressive” (diffuse mixed, diffuse large cell, large cell immunoblastic)30 I + II, 19 III + IVRadiotherapy only or CHOP ± radiotherapy
 Schaefer et al. (30)55 DLBCLNANA
 Spaepen et al. (24)7350 DLBCL, 8 ALCL, 7 ALCL HD-like, 5 MCL, 3 PTCLNADoxorubicin-containing regimen or UKCCSG protocol (pediatric cases)
  • * Who met inclusion criteria of this systematic review.

  • According to Ann Arbor staging system.

  • Eight relapsed cases (excluded) received salvage therapy with or without high-dose therapy followed by stem-cell transplantation.

  • § Treatment strategy for HD in children and adolescents (35).

  • Data abstracted from total participants, not limited to patients who were evaluated with PET at end of therapy.

  • ALCL = anaplastic large cell lymphoma; BCL = B-cell lymphoma; BEACOPP = bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone; CEP = CCNU, etoposide, prednimustine; C-MOPP = cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone; CNOP = cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, vincristine, prednisone; FL = follicular lymphoma; LD = lymphocyte depleted; LP = lymphocyte predominance; MC = mixed cellularity; MCL = mantle cell lymphoma; NA = not available; NS = nodular sclerosis; ProMACE-CytaBOM = prednisone, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, cytarabine, bleomycin, vincristine, methotrexate; PTCL = peripheral T-cell lymphoma; R-CHOP = rituximab plus CHOP; Stanford V = doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechlorethamine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, prednisone; UKSCCG = United Kingdom children cancer study group; WHO = World Health Organization.