TABLE 3

SPM Results in ET Subjects Compared with PD Subjects According to Template Used for Normalization

Cluster level			Voxel level			MNI coordinates (mm)
P_corrected	K_E	P_uncorrected	P_corrected	Z score	P_uncorrected	t	x	y	z	Location
ET > PD with template A1
0.000	1,415	0.000	0.001	5.30	0.000	14.97	24	6	2	R putamen
			0.004	4.96	0.000	12.13	32	−2	−8
			0.009	4.79	0.000	10.94	28	−8	10
0.000	1,074	0.000	0.014	4.71	0.000	10.45	−28	−2	4	L putamen
			0.024	4.60	0.000	9.79	−34	−8	6
			0.164	4.06	0.000	7.23	−14	4	4
ET > PD with template A2
0.000	1,506	0.000	0.000	5.40	0.000	15.91	24	8	0	R putamen
			0.003	5.02	0.000	12.59	20	2	−8
			0.003	5.01	0.000	12.50	28	4	10
0.000	1,095	0.000	0.005	4.90	0.000	11.70	−26	−2	2	L putamen
			0.057	4.40	0.000	8.74	−14	22	−8
			0.154	4.06	0.000	7.22	−26	16	4
ET > PD with template B
0.000	1,478	0.000	0.000	5.39	0.000	15.79	24	6	0	R putamen
			0.003	4.99	0.000	12.32	32	−6	−2
			0.010	4.76	0.000	10.79	28	−10	8
0.000	1,151	0.000	0.005	4.90	0.000	11.73	−26	−2	4	L putamen
			0.033	4.52	0.000	9.37	−34	−8	6
			0.056	4.41	0.000	8.77	−16	22	−6
ET > PD with template C
0.000	1,573	0.000	0.001	5.25	0.000	14.49	32	−6	−2	R putamen
			0.001	5.23	0.000	14.34	22	6	2
			0.004	4.95	0.000	12.04	26	4	10
0.000	1,115	0.000	0.017	4.66	0.000	10.17	−26	−2	2	L putamen
			0.034	4.52	0.000	9.33	−32	−8	6
			0.047	4.44	0.000	8.97	−22	18	4

K_E = number of voxels per cluster; R = right; L = left.