TABLE 4

Lesion- and Examination-Based Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, PPV, and NPV of PET and PET/CT Examinations

Value of parameter, % (95% exact binomial confidence interval)
Lesion-based analysisLesion-based analysis with lesions detected by CT only excludedExamination-based analysis
Status of equivocal fociParameterPET (n = 640*)PET/CT (n = 733)PET (n = 609)PET/CT (n = 609)PET (n = 163)PET/CT (n = 163)
ExcludedSensitivity71 (64–78)87 (81–91)87 (80–92)86 (79–91)92 (81–98)96 (87–100)
Specificity95 (93–97)97 (95–99)95 (93–97)97 (95–99)88 (79–94)92 (84–97)
Accuracy88 (85–91)94 (93–97)93 (93–97)94 (93–97)90 (86–98)94 (91–100)
PPV87 (80–92)92 (87–96)87 (80–92)91 (85–95)84 (72–93)89 (78–96)
NPV88 (85–91)95 (93–97)95 (93–97)95 (93–97)94 (86–98)97 (91–100)
Classified as benignSensitivity63 (56–70)77 (70–82)75 (68–82)77 (70–83)80 (68–89)85 (73–93)
Specificity96 (94–98)98 (96–99)96 (94–98)97 (95–99)91 (84–96)94 (88–98)
Accuracy86 (82–89)92 (90–94)90 (89–94)92 (89–94)87 (81–94)91 (84–96)
PPV87 (80–92)92 (87–96)87 (80–92)91 (85–95)84 (72–93)89 (78–96)
NPV86 (82–89)92 (90–94)91 (89–94)92 (89–94)89 (81–94)92 (84–96)
Classified as malignantSensitivity74 (67–80)88 (83–92)88 (82–93)87 (81–92)93 (84–98)97 (88–100)
Specificity84 (80–87)85 (82–88)84 (80–87)91 (88–93)65 (55–74)70 (60–79)
Accuracy81 (85–91)86 (93–97)85 (93–97)90 (93–97)75 (86–98)80 (91–100)
PPV66 (59–72)67 (61–73)66 (59–72)77 (70–83)61 (50–71)65 (54–75)
NPV88 (85–91)95 (93–97)95 (93–97)95 (93–97)94 (86–98)97 (91–100)
  • * Including 31 malignant foci detected by CT but not by PET alone and therefore graded as benign (score, 1).