Methods of Assessing 18F-FDG Uptake (1)
Method | Advantage | Disadvantage | Dependency |
---|---|---|---|
Visual | Static/whole-body imaging | Subjectivity | Uptake time |
No need for blood sampling | Chance of threshold variation between readers | Blood glucose concentration | |
Short scan times | Low statistics | Partial-volume effects | |
± Attenuation correction | Single snapshot of dynamic process | ||
Dependency on background activity | |||
SUV | Static/whole-body imaging | Numerous methods of calculation | Uptake time |
Semiquantitative analysis | Low statistics | Blood glucose concentration | |
No need for blood sampling | Single snapshot of dynamic process | Body weight | |
Ease of computation | Need for attenuation correction | Partial-volume effects | |
Inaccuracy in detecting small changes | |||
Kinetic | Dynamic data acquisition | Need for input function (arterial preferred) | Partial-volume effects |
Quantitative analysis | Complexity of computation | Quality of input function | |
Low dependency on imaging time |