TABLE 2

Performance of 18F-FDG PET and CT for Lymph Node Staging

Type of cancerStageImaging typeSensitivitySpecificityAccuracyPPVNPV
Both EGC and AGCN1PET34% (18/53)96% (27/28)56% (45/81)95% (18/19)44% (27/62)
CT58% (31/53)89% (25/28)69% (56/81)91% (31/34)53% (25/47)
N2PET34% (11/32)96% (47/49)72% (58/81)85% (11/13)69% (47/68)
CT44% (14/32)86% (42/49)69% (56/81)67% (14/21)70% (42/60)
N3PET50% (3/6)99% (74/75)95% (77/81)75% (3/4)96% (74/77)
CT50% (3/6)99% (74/75)95% (77/81)75% (3/4)96% (74/77)
EGC only (n = 17)N1PET33%(1/3)100%(14/14)88%(15/17)100%(1/1)88%(14/16)
CT33% (1/3)100% (14/14)88% (15/17)100% (1/1)88% (14/16)
N2PET0% (0/2)100% (15/15)88% (15/17)88% (15/17)
CT0% (0/2)100% (15/15)88% (15/17)88% (15/17)
N3PET100% (17/17)100% (17/17)100% (17/17)
CT100% (17/17)100% (17/17)100% (17/17)
AGC only (n = 64)N1PET34% (17/50)93% (13/14)47% (30/64)94% (17/18)28% (13/46)
CT60% (30/50)79% (11/14)64% (41/64)91% (30/33)35% (11/31)
N2PET37% (11/30)94% (32/34)67% (43/64)85% (11/13)63% (32/51)
CT47% (14/30)79% (27/34)64% (41/64)67% (14/21)63% (27/43)
N3PET50% (3/6)98% (57/58)94% (60/64)75% (3/4)95% (57/60)
CT50% (3/6)98% (57/58)94% (60/64)75% (3/4)95% (57/60