Direct Comparisons Between Resting 201Tl Imaging and DE (166 Patients, 8 Studies)
| Study | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201Tl | DE | 201Tl | DE | |||
| Qureshi et al. (9) | 90 (38/42) | 76 (32/42) | 56 (59/106) | 82 (87/106) | ||
| Nagueh et al. (10) | 76 (42/46) | 92 (23/25) | 43 (27/63) | 71 (25/35) | ||
| Perrone-Filardi et al. (11) | 100 (73/73) | 79 (58/73) | 22 (8/36) | 83 (30/36) | ||
| Marzullo et al. (19) | 86 (42/49) | 82 (40/49) | 92 (24/26) | 92 (24/26) | ||
| Alfieri et al. (20) | 94 (92/98) | 91 (85/93) | 64 (14/22) | 78 (25/32) | ||
| Charney et al. (21) | 91 (19/20) | 70 (22/31) | 85 (11/13) | 93 (25/27) | ||
| Pace et al. (22) | 91 (35/46) | 52 (24/46) | 74 (34/46) | 87 (40/46) | ||
| Senior et al. (23) | 92 (108/118) | 78 (39/50) | 87 (103/118) | 82 (41/50) | ||
| Weighted mean | 91 (449/492) | 79 (323/409) | 65 (280/430) | 83 (297/358) | ||
Data in parentheses are numbers of segments.