TABLE 1

Comparison of Patients in Two Protocols

Parameter1-d protocol2-d protocol
No. of cases514152
Mean age* (y)57.3 (22–88)55.2 (31–87)
Size of primary (mean ± SD)1.4 ± 0.91.6 ± 1.1
Histology
    Ductal387 (75.3%)117 (77.0%)
    Lobular44 (8.6%)10 (6.6%)
    Other83 (16.0%)89 (16.4%)
Positive SLN (%)3037
Prior excisional biopsy235 (45.7%)89 (58.6%)
Site
    Upper outer quadrant270 (52.5%)91 (59.9%)
    Upper inner quadrant87 (16.9%)12 (7.9%)
    Lower outer quadrant49 (9.5%)25 (16.4%)
    Lower inner quadrant31 (6.0%)6 (3.9%)
    Central63 (12.3%)13 (8.6%)
    Unknown or no cancer found14 (2.7%)5 (3.3%)
  • * Range in parentheses.

  • Invasive component only. Patients with unknown size or diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (no invasive component) or patients with no cancer found at time of resection were not included.

  • Includes 11 cases with no cancer found in 1-d protocol and 3 cases with no cancer found in 2-d protocols.