TABLE 2

Comparison of DVRs Measured with Full Kinetic Modeling Against Reference Tissue Model and Simple Ratio Technique

ParameterDVRReference regionRatio
MBTHALSTRMBTHALSTRMBTHALSTR
Mean ± SD2.16 ± 0.231.70 ± 0.191.58 ± 0.152.01 ± 0.171.63 ± 0.161.53 ± 0.122.23 ± 0.221.83 ± 0.181.68 ± 0.19
Test–retest (%)7.73.56.35.42.34.67.63.98.2
Intersubject (%)5.38.86.85.28.15.46.97.19.8
ri0.320.460.220.030.640.150.090.400.48
DVR R20.940.970.950.890.980.93
DVR slope0.72 ± 0.070.86 ± 0.060.79 ± 0.070.93 ± 0.120.97 ± 0.051.23 ± 0.13
  • MB = midbrain; THAL = thalamus; STR = striatum; Test–retest = mean absolute difference between each subject’s mean value and each individual value; Intersubject = between-subject variability, calculated same way as Test–retest; ri = intraclass correlation coefficient; R2 = correlation coefficient of simplified methods against full kinetic model; slope = gradient of regression between simplified methods of analysis and full kinetic model.