TABLE 2.

Prediction of Need for Carotid Shunting During Carotid Endarterectomy by Clinical Risk Factors, rCBF, and rCVR on ACZ-SPECT

Predictor of carotid shuntingNo. of carotid shunts (%)Fisher's exact testCrude odds ratioLogistic regression
Odds ratioP
Age (y)
 <59 (n = 21)2 (9.5)NS2.74.3NS
 ≥60 (n = 54)12 (22.2)
Sex
 Female (n = 12)1 (8.3)NS2.90.9NS
 Male (n = 63)13 (20.6)
Minor stroke or TIA
 No (n = 12)2 (16.7)NS1.20.4NS
 Yes (n = 63)12 (19.0)
Diabetes mellitus
 No (n = 42)6 (14.3)NS1.92.3NS
 Yes (n = 33)8 (24.2)
Hypertension
 No (n = 17)3 (17.6)NS1.10.5NS
 Yes (n = 58)11 (20.0)
Smoking
 No (n = 30)4 (13.3)NS1.91.7NS
 Yes (n = 45)10 (22.2)
Contralateral ICA stenosis (%)
 <70 (n = 54)7 (13.0)P = 0.0543.42.2NS
 ≥70 (n = 21)7 (33.3)
rCBF
 Normal (n = 34)5 (14.7)NS1.61.5NS
 Reduced* (n = 41)9 (22.0)
rCVR
 Normal (n = 45)3 (6.7)P < 0.01 8.113.5<0.01
 Reduced (n = 30)11 (36.7)
  Mild (n = 22)3 (13.6)
  Severe§ (n = 8)8 (100)
  • * <60% of normal deep ipsilateral cerebellar activity over one third of territory of middle cerebral artery on basal SPECT image.

  • Abnormal cerebral perfusion that fell into even lower color range from basal SPECT after ACZ administration over at least one third of territory of middle cerebral artery.

  • One color range from basal SPECT after ACZ administration (10%–20% change).

  • § At least 2 color ranges after ACZ administration (>20% change).

  • NS = not significant (P > 0.1).