TABLE 2.

Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy Between 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET (Per-Patient and Per-Region Analysis) for Tumors in Which 68Ga-FAPI Outperformed 18F-FDG PET

Tumor entitynStratificationPET-positive/ totalSensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVAccuracy
68Ga-FAPI PET
 Colorectal14Per-patient11/1490.9 (58.7–99.8)66.7 (9.4–99.2)90.9 (66.6–98)66.7 (20.8–93.9)85.7 (57.2–98.2)
Per-region17/4594.1 (71.3–99.9)96.4 (81.7–99.9)94.1 (69.9–99.1)96.4 (80.1–99.5)95.6 (84.9–99.5)
 Prostate22Per-patient22/22100 (84.6–100)100100
Per-region33/5594.3 (80.8–99.3)100 (83.2–100)10090.9 (72.3–97.5)96.4 (87.5–99.6)
18F-FDG PET
 Colorectal14Per-patient10/1481.8 (48.2–97.7)66.7 (9.43–99.2)90 (63.9–97.9)50 (18.4–81.6)78.6 (49.2–95.3)
Per-region17/4588.2 (63.6–98.5)92.9 (76.5–99.1)88.2 (66.1–96.7)92.9 (77.9–98)91.1 (78.8–97.5)
 Prostate22Per-patient20/2290.9 (70.84–98.9)10090.9
Per-region31/5588.6 (73.3–96.8)100 (83.2–100)10083.3 (66.53–92.63)92.7 (82.41–97.98)
  • Data in parentheses are 95% CI.